OCR Text |
Show SUPREME COURT IJOUIICES DOCKET State . Interested in Three Cases Appearing in the j October List I Thre caf in which ".he ctate of; ITtah im concern v1 , ar itchf-jiiled to b h.ird durin the October term of the state supreme court, arcordlns; to the docket Issued today by W. II. Griffith, rlcrk of the court. The Hut of rases Includes the sp- peal of R H. Siddowsy from the con-r con-r vict Ion of misappropriation of public funds In the Third district court. HuMoway was- formerly state fish and Kama romintssioner. lit was cliarced with misappropriation of funds of the offir and waa convicted and sentenced to prison, but he has . been at liberty pending decision on the appeal to the supreme court. Three cae are applications for review of decisions of the state industrial in-dustrial commission and two are on writs of prohibition. The entire docket Tiie state of t'tah. respondent, v. Tt. II. Hi(Woway, appHlnnt; from Third fiintrict court, U B. Vt is ht, judge; uc-tot'r uc-tot'r . The state of Vtsh. respon1ent. vs. N. T'eterson, appfllant ; from Thtnl district court, M. L. Ultchie, JuUe; (.ictober 9 The stats of . T'tah. respondent vs. .loe Zeezlrh. sppllsnt; from Stvrnih .llHiri.-t court, J k. Woods JudKv: 1 Otttihf-r 9. , I The state of VUb, respondent, vs. C. ('. Monroe snd Krsnk Antic, ap- ! pellants: from First district court; Oct otter 10. HiMord Copper company, Pont In en-I tal Casualty compaiiy, jilalntiffs. vs. i . InttUBtrlal commission of I'tsh and' Mrs. Henry White, defendants: re I View. Kd'n Irrigation company et at., plaint Iffs. s. district court of Weher rotiDty, lion. J. N. Kimball. JtulKe. Uf-mis nt : prrthi tilt ion. tNtober 10. H. K. Caldwell, as stste ena-fneer, plulntiff, vs. Joseph If. Krlknon. di-trivt di-trivt Juda. -t al.. defendants: nro-hit.itivn: nro-hit.itivn: (Ktor.er 11. fhief nn. Minltia: company, -plain- ' t ft, vs. Mrs. C. Kallstmry sad Indus-trial Indus-trial 4-ommiftnn of t'tah, defendants; revii.sr: i-tnlr 11. II. I.. Mroton. plaint If, vs. Industrial Indus-trial commission of I'tah et al., dc- 1 fendantn; review: October It. 1 Joseph HnrhOKlio et al.. respondents, j vs. A. I-:. Uibsoit e .. defendants. I'tah Terminsl Itnilwny com pan v. ap- ; peliant: from Seventh riistnet court, I. Woolley, jiidre; Ot tb r t3. ! .losfph jt. ltunc-., rrapuntlent, vs.! Harvey A. Pace. sppeMsnl from j Fourth district court, - K. Hnnsoii, Judire: October 11. j n J. A. Iturbldfre, administrator, ap-pllsut, ap-pllsut, vs. I'tah Klffht and Traction 1 company, respondent ; from Thlid dts- ! trbt court, M. 1 Itit'iiie, Judge; Oc-toher Oc-toher 1 tt. W-rlllam Arta 1 r, respondent, vs. : .Tames M. Peterson hsnk, sppellnnt; from Sixth dls'rfrt court, J. II. Krick- son. judse: October 1. William !. Pilvet1; tespnndent vs. Paniuel J. Hftlt, appellant; from Third l dfirlct court, F.. Hansen, Judffe; Oc- V tober "M. .Martin Olsn. administrator, sppel- Isnt. vs. Olive AC K-ott et al.. respond-eritsr respond-eritsr from First district court, I. It. V'laht. judae; October 1. Maw Jane nurton. respondent, vs. Fmerv K. LaOiike, appellant: from Third distHrt court, W.. M. McCrea. j Jujlsre; Ortober 17. i 'riiks Morctn. respondent, vs. Cht'd, I Co'e A Co., ennellant; from Fifth dts- ffb t court, W. F. Knox. Judge: Of- i tober 17. I Hinphftni Conl and I, umber company j er st.. reapondents. vs. hoard of education edu-cation appellant, r'on West, defend- I ant: from Third district court. O. A. I Jveon. judsre: October 17. The Ocean Accident and Guaranty comnanv, respondent, vs. Otto Meek. ! appetlant: from Second district court, ' O. R. Barker, judre; October tH. Klfxabefh .1 O'ltrien, respondent, vs. Cenrae M. Alston et si.. sipeltnns: f-eni Third distrtft court. K. Hanson. Jurtfe: October . Art I iiir A. r'nl7. administrator an-peltaiit. an-peltaiit. vs In'ernat'onul Rmelftn; trr.p-nv. reaporf-Pt; from Third dls-tn dls-tn -t court, V. M. McCrea, Judge; Oc-t4,t.er Oc-t4,t.er 1. Mlna T,. .Tlmpon. respondent, vs orr V. Chnndler. defendant. Bins- J bam rnsl and T. company, appellant: i frcm Tbirt district court, K. Hanson, t Jn-lire; October 19. I tntermoiintstrt Association of Credit ' Men. etc.. spneMsrt vs. P.. C. Oavlea. cstt'-ndent from Third district court, i M. ftiteht. Itidsre: Octolr 19. I. tor.el C. Pavne, an Infan. by C. B. ' tie. respendent. vs. t'tsh-Idnho ! Snrar company, aopellent from Sixth dt st rirt court, J. II. Erlrkson. Judge; : October 19 Marie P. Barn lose, resnondent, vs. j IT. W. Ramlnse, appellant: from Sly'h 1 district court, W. F. Knox, Judge; i . October ta. 0r Ann Ta's et si., sppetlants. vs. , w FpiHc M. Morse, sdmlnlsf rstor. et si.' respondents: from First district court, ' A. A. Lew. Judge: October n. I H. B. Kpanler resnondept. vs. .Tohn ' P.' Corbss "heriff. Mi11er-shoon company, com-pany, snnetlants- from Third district ro'ir. W. 51. McCres, Jude; October Octo-ber ;. W C Mct-euehlln. responden. vs. ' fTiief Consoltdsted Mining rnmninv. ! t sppetlsnt. .1. R Hanlev. defendant; frm Tird district court. K. Hanson. ' Jild-e: October 7. ' a WIHs H'iniamsn, respondent. v 1 Kn'm B H"ntsman et al.. anneltsnts: frr.m Fif'h dis'rtct court. J. II. Krli k-' on. Judge: o-toher 25 Oregon Short I-lne Railroad com- pe ny. snpellant. vs. Bamteraer F.lec-tr'e F.lec-tr'e B'lroad - ' companv. eespondep .: from Third district c'rt. W. H HrTik -udre; October 5S. ! ITowse4 F. Goildard. sppeMant. vs. : IetiPsMnn Motor rompinv et ni.. respondents: re-spondents: frorn Second district court,! Oeorge P Barker. Ji'dge; October ?4. . f. A. Robinson snd 4Hce ttoMpson. I ' nr.oadentS. VS Tli Rehoepfeld. pn. ps'.lsnl: from Sixth district court. W. e. Kr.oT, Juds-e: October ?4. ( W If. l.iwlf snd iHce Las-lev. appellants, vs W. A- H''fcen1oorer at. reanosdents: from Sevnlh district cj"rf . p. K. Woods, Judre; October Tt. ' Tsssachusetts Bonding and Investment Invest-ment company, respondent vs. C'U'luhv Psckn4p companv. appellant: rf-n TMrd district court: M. I Ritchie. ii1e October 13. i:orf vieV'll rtirorent. v9 WI1- irict court. E. Hanson, Judge; October Octo-ber :o Marv Frances Wall el al. respondent, respond-ent, ti. I It. Kccles, appeilant; from Third d 1st rlet court, M 1 Jtltclne. Jmlse; I tcoier .. The Hvhk .Motor company. re. spondent. vs. Murphv WholIe Ciro-cerv Ciro-cerv companv. appellsnt; from Third district court. M. L. Itltchie, jude; Octnl.er 10 Alfred M. Jones, respondent. vs. William Moore et si., appellant : Oc-tcber Oc-tcber SI Anslo-Californla Trust cempanv. respondent, re-spondent, vs. C. W. Hall, sppel'an: ; loiter SI. liam It. McNeil et at, appeitants: from fctecoi.d district court, J. S. Kimball. Kim-ball. Judge; October Zi. Pameron Valley Reservoir company, respondent, vs. Itenjamln Blake el alH appellants: from Fifth district court, W. F. Kjmx. Jud?e: October 25. Bear It1 er Vslley Improvement company, respondent, vs. Hrsm Jen- , son. sppelisnt; from First district court. A. A. lesw. Judge: October J. A. Stewsrt rej.potident. vs. U A. Hassan, appellant, from First district dis-trict court, A. A. Law, Jud. Octo- , brr :. Arthur D. Cooler et at., apneltsnts. I a W V. Csll et si., respondents; I froan First district court. M. C. Ilsr-rss. Ilsr-rss. Judge; October 5. Walker Bros. Iry Goods company. appellant, vi Alma Woudhall. re-I sronrient: fror.-. Tnird fltstricl court, L. Il Wight, fudge: October :7. C. ThunipaHn, r;sFFondent. vs. Ada C. Taylor et si., appellants: from Second Sec-ond district court, (i. . Itarker, judge, j ictober 27. Tltomss Singleton. sdmlnist rator, I respondent, va Tbotnas- J Keliv ei j in., apr-etlent"; froto Fourth district I " ut't. K llnnson. ju.iae: o l '-r 7 ll"e-r T-tKii. eesjwuH-ei.t. -for cH i ScUuu. ajellaal. lrum sourik d.- 1 |