Show THE SUPREME COURT 11 Usual Htmber of Cases Argued ant i I Suballted I i A JUISIIUX UI WAIlt ItKillr Oirnmlilp of lie A Vninitl Hiucli I lu IlloSouhhcdolt > for Ilinugci lialnl hbo Mntlitrn Inclllo I Clue mull rjuiiuer of 0401 were IP a uejouj ubmltlcj In IhoHjprcuii outttoday tlUBtfllUNUl ATIllllltUIIT The htwI Csoentgu id woe that of M I 4 Sullivan I et al pUlntia I and apptl hoohoto vi hoot Moituirn Hpy I Mining I SOIhlOlIstly doenl ul aulrei ndentt I Th cow It an appeal boot Sloe Judu 1 I ooieOO and order leu r In u jtlea tot a n ewlriilln llii > Third llllot csurt bobor dodge Hutch llm lUlmllli eet foilli hit Ihey urtera owniri of boo 1ekln mlnlbi Inlmiu Tlnllo mining dlinet Juan county Ottoon localtd the ground rai vacant and uu cupleJ iiulilio ml Iheru well certain trelli upon II I lento Illteen lift dHacil they I Oat I beta there fur lomo Join knd bd bet i uied for waleilur ilork thou thtir belni ub lined by uilbtf e I iludlaii luey further conto id looM 1 I hu deeuJnnti Iruipiued upon their I lilm nu u Un Injuring the true iud tuoX uwy large iu > nlltlei of vater I iou 1nJA1 oual the kllegatlont illbaoomiliiliit cud alloxid loot lot naujf joi IUU 111 IB lOis bl the Hi I 1 vtllt 0 i wtlliliail been tlu > In iiouruuiido sovcrol soot umbracl In Hi l Uiu claim lint walr Ibto l hoe l i uocuieil therulri tijr the preJccrft nil lulnleriil al UIB defindiut lj that tIle troilliJ w0SObJ I solely vaiuab ui nee uiu 0 aud by resins c1 tie ollc oil Wo0 Ihu data of lbs dig uno Ilipwa i lulllo hoot of tba L ulled titilM without mluiuli flier 00 ruuy lullcitUn uf uilnetnl hot ills well still waur Iherefrjiii were lo aud euloyri ly I Ills owner of tha oitlierii HI l t010ur which was oU lu Ibu lotuS a iJ Uul with the mlu bog clm oOi Iraniferred wai trios lured all fin rlRill ol J uwnen lo tha ijrandini o tuu well I mud that II ha row that isIs lakeu watir there f UIJ1 Irom Joe of the uialu I luihOloS Ito S volvel I nilo whether tots wells eta be dined ai ualuril water ounui I AMI OUNII sunniaiuit tIe next CUP ainiled lillJ lubmltlcil tune that cf A L llirnei r lilutlll and ieiondnl vr tl 1 Cox dateu dntaiul eiiallint lha cm I I up I reeled from Ilia deolilon of doing Hmllb In the I ° ourlli dlilrlct U li nt forth that ou the II of Mircb loud plalntin was In ponmlon of land In llux Lldur I county deilunattd ai an 0 IUlldnlid known ni tba Port New mm ranch that In May Ib91 ilifend ant took IUIIHI on ol talJ prcmliii ai Ibo inenl nod tenant of plilntllf utoulmn R looluol Ihrlolor rolr1 I Into between the J irlli wbertby de Zrtdnot was lo iirfoim ccrtalu work iblo lj Ju and Ulior on iilu rcniiici cud woe lo IB allowed to occupy Ibo lame while In rformanceof tIle c00110nt or for suds Icnulh of time ai lalnllfl luUhl lermlllilmiii to do that In I March ISO 1 0 lllillll nnle demand In writ 0tJ ut Sold Oefcndint to deliver up anJuurreuder lo bolos tbo pminlon of IhJ iiemlioi Cbs ilatiillll fuilhor ulleKei lIst defendaut roluted unil ne lcctoJ for the spaCe ol flora Ihu lOts OBJI nltir the uioUlDc of lucli demand lo lull P usd5 Oil of nU I tainlit Whirifota pltlullll demandi toil IIrul 1OI 1IIIaJlul rJI Iloe rnititutlonotiald lImR pomliei nod f U e III hliauiwir defendant denied that talDlllt I wai ou Ibo data menlloued oral or-al any lime had Iuo I In the nulit and jsisutcatte oqor don of mid bode p or Ibaldefoudiint I kt any lime went lulu I I 005550 Ion Ihnol ai UUOI or llol of lalnllll I lefe idint lurllur avert that Ihu land wm on abruaiy It 1 IsUI uu lurvcytd tul on that diy deleudinl tiled ou the Unit and gave Ibo liken Ull nullco of hit Intention to claim It ILnt lbs limit tony aloe beau KUI ve 1 ad by authority of the kovariiinont lbs map nod Hold uulei of uch out voy have been flIrt owl approved by the local Uud ofllco uod or lendIng Hi al Bporoviuienl Lifuro the iteuenl bond I 101 Whllllub I Iho tno Woo triad In the fourth dhs trlct court at 1Jtau before Judge 1 We Hmllh aiU judKUient entered for tliaiuiioiiloiiof the i reniliei aad boor filiAl daooagwe and 1710 costs Ihu kllculwn nikeu ou the ground hat UiuoMiijUInt doe out aisle tool cut flclont fur I cauia of action UDd the judgment li unauthorized boll ICilsO100bo 1SJU11IU The casio of Junes Chaiiman thus lid kuu reipoudiul vi the Houlberu lacUlo rnnopooy 1001 ond aptallaiit wai then taken up Thli woe a ulll Our dntoa gssagu lust Ski do fendHiit comgiuy brouijlit In I Hie 1ouith dlitrlct for leronal blurt rtceived while lu lbs employ or laid comiiny The uniounl ol damage niked was JlUlWl but when the cite WON mInd Judgment was rendered for 31 and cOil of lull Au ippeil wj tyke on Ibo cound host She avl cincu failed lo Juitlfy hoe verdloi that thom vurdlol u ac loit law tbat the UknlHgt HTB BDVI1VV ioU that arioii cccurred at 1 Shoe liUI stool uxctltod lo by delenlint The iaie wan argued uu tiibmlltod It ki eiri that 1 Lba man was umployed lu and uboutkiawmillowned by tbe defend unt coiuiauy lu lIon hljtr county lour aol wbllu niKjrmUi rtJufUI llirnwn un lo thu law aud hi hand udiy I cut 01 rvmou 01 the platform ou wblcu hu Hood ulliij way UIIMUS An o lulou wm naudcil 1 down today diiuyluic Ii 0500 m of luuiidnla whlcn William 11 1Uul npilled for ustaiosl Judge W Hnntii Aoohtlllo lUll AOJIBJIOM Dm lullulnit Kiiulleuieu OlIpIlod I for II 7 fhul nuiuunlu I 0 lo hhoo lit ul Ihu uurrma Louit todi l 1 1 1 ord C t Hllli und 1 1 Jtlr reLoiunienJed hyAU lurneyW I < Minsiunlinii l iA Uu n common JoU uyAtluruvyi Varlau Tliuy were rile i rvd lu Lou mmlllaa wuiuu WAI appoluleJ yojtttJiy |