Show u. u S 'S S Nearest to Democratic Ideal Former Russian Premier Thinks NEV YORK March 10 AP- AP Alexander Alexandcr who led the first attempt at democratic govern govern- mont ment In end and was ousted by bythe bythe the believes it impossible ble to attain the democratic ideal anywhere in the world under pre pre- ent social conditions The United States has the nearest approach to the ideal he hc thinks The equality ot of opportunity which you rou have in America while not yet bringing th thE country countr to a perfect state distinguishes AmerIca favorably from flom countries coun- coun tries he said toda today We Ve are witnessing In the world the begInning of a real democracy and America is ahead An intensive economic develop develop- merit ment posSible now only under capItalistic capitalistic cap cap- institutions Is the neCeSsary necessary sary prerequisite for the future real democracy The real democracy is not only political but economic STARTED WRONG The world meaning ot of the bol- bol experiment in Russia is that they wanted there to build a democracy cy through the destruction ot oi political democracy In over over- throWing capitalism Russia Hussla wa forced later to go back bacI to the beginning beginning be- be ginning of capitalistic accumulation as a result M. M r. r gave his view In English and arid and also made use of an interpreter but for emphasis he used usel French After Arter a week In fn New York he said Mid his chief impression of American Amerlean Amer- Amer lean ican life liCe was its creative intensity tt 1 am overwhelmed by it AmerIca America Amer- Amer Ica represents a very intensive and creative human effort Here the human being is more free hampered hampered ham ham- by less prejudice and nd tradition tradition tion than in Europe It is a new country will Vill you ou d define communism and fascism Communism and fascism are the antithesis of the idea of democracy different In color and degree but their opposition to the Idea of demo demo de- de mo racy unites them Both movements move move- merits ments are reactionary in hi their substance substance sub sub- stance because both are a against the freedom ot of the individual |