Show r When Prohibition Wins Wins Wins- the de death th of eight hund hundred ed men an and w 0 t men in m New York caused by drinking l p liquor during the year 1926 the thep i. i p blichas has a ghastly warning It indicates here ere the bootleggers bootleggers' patrons may finish ruU celebrations We do not conform to tk e prohibition prohibition- view t the effect that it ves these people right that if they they will I i It they are entItled to scant consider consider- fion This is a rather stern manner in to reach the ultimate hope of our most dent prohibitionists an and does not take into r the fact this pOisoned output some some- t times finds its way into more or less inno- inno c t stomachs claiming toll of those who ri 1 could never be classed as intemperate It is pleasing to note that after a good goodr r many years the government is preparing to relieve itself of responsibilities in this matter I that are to be made to the practice of poisoning alcohol tIis now believed and this seems likely that ilc hol can be made unpalatable without Ii f made fatal This of course was the I r n of the government t when It began f the output believing no doubt that the citizenship would shun it as it does i e. e and arsenic It however failed to reckon on the curi- curi sity and the daring speculations of some of ur people finding snow now that men and andin I t f in one city took chances which cost lives This doesn't begin to tell the ther ft r ry of poisoned liquor but it should be suf- suf t l nt to open the eyes of the casual drinker rinker dangers of the modern output Pro Pro- originally was evolved with the i pe of saving men from slow deaths Noth- Noth m mis is gained by speeding the ultimate end Hh th poisons deliberately placed in alcohol t l hh h may find find its way to unskilled boot boot- lepers rs |