Show NTAII nurmni counr case ot 11toye o n oil Iak city Argumenti were made before the f Supreme court today U the case of Guy O lloyce plilnlllT and respond C cnl vi Bait Last Clly defendant appellant Koycu wa convlolol In tile police court on the 23rd l ol January 1 Janu-ary 1893 of vagrancy and eonlonced f j to tixiy days Imprlionmeul by the boeUY jiiitlcv of the pence W W r 1 Gee About au Slit of Feb 1 t ij1 tuary he was engaged break IDII rock on the rock pilot when a piece of stone was broken all rr tw r I i from a rock on which another prlnoner woo at work itrlklnit him In the lace < jl and deitroyliiR the sight of Ibo rlgbt eye and Injuring the eight of the rDtDL ItJ other He brought suit DRalust I the city Claiming 20000 The Jury awarded him 7600 trout wblcb ti judgment the city pealud > i Power Hiraup f Llppwau are I Itjyot4 attorneyi Au giant Oily l I Attorney D lJ llttmpitoad appeareu tJ I for the city Argumen were also heard In Ibo 1 case o the V otor Uold and Silver jlt II Mining uinpanr plalut IT nutl appellant 1n j appel-lant vii the National Book 01 sun I HpilHo or > i i deltn luils anti Ie i il il ipoudents Brown A Ilonilerson appealed ap-pealed for plnUO and Bantu lite A Way and Dry Btrel for defendant PlalnllU alleges mat lio wan the owner of several mining claim In the Tlullo mining districtagalnut wblcb a levy was made In March 16C3 to satisfy satis-fy a Judgment procured by Tucker and Wallace At the Bale 6f tile property proper-ty It WBl bouzht In by T A Clawson blbL itv In August 1894 J M Wheeler ae We Parks suit E D It Thompson who bad previously obtained Judgment Judg-ment against plaintiff commenced a joint action against Clawson plaintiffs aDd William Otoeslerk picstilent ol tbo mining c6mpony to set aside and l cancel the desd mad lo Cliwson alleging 1 al-leging fraud mud collation between be three to chat the plaintiff After a bearing the deed was set elide aDd cancelled and a diorte made that the rorrty > be Bold and the proceeds to psy the Judgment amonnllng to 750 of Wheeler Parts and Tbompion In November 1894 rank Knox preil dent cl tbe defendant bank bought Ihe properly under the order of sale Prior 10 ibis the bank bad obtained a judgment judg-ment Against Oroesbeck for 0000 and as the bolder of the judgment redeemed re-deemed the property from Kuox who bald the certificate of esle nod bad U transferred to Ibo defendant In March of 1893 plalolJO deilroni of redeeming the property tendered be bank the amount or The judgment and decree but detention refused lo accept Ibe same Judge King decided rl i1f i ft f hat plaintiff bad no title to the proper Iy In dispute flora which Judgment ilalnllu appeals The supreme court bas denied the petition of the county for a rebearlng of the case of 1 the Pleasant Valley Coal company agalnil the board of county commissioners for Ball Lake county Chief Justice Zone dissenting The county will probably Issue bonds to take up between 30000 and 119000 outstanding variants prior to Jau lisa li-sa |