Show I OES G1UNSIPRliTI iI L I erdlct ForI 1 lnthe 1 Holding Jam t J ago Suit I ioruiN A SAID Auour COSTS ntslIoD of mla Will rely Them Supreme Uurt Oilier Court Jlatliri j The Jury In the Ilofellng damage mil against Policeman John 11 1 Roberts et al came Into court bin I afternoon with n verdict of tl for i pltlnllfland against exCbiet ol Police Po-lice Arthur Pratt llofollng sued the ofUctri for an I I alleged false arrest and Imprisonment md demanded 1000 damages The i use dales back to the 23th al f May 1894 when General Smith and big Ii army were itorpcd from entering Davis county by Pratt and his moor Hofellng in company wlthCaptaln i Vlnon of the home reserve made I 1 a night visit to the camp of General < J 1 Gen-eral Smith who was at that time being hold under au I lnunctlve order i alIbI dividing line between Davis and > Vcber counties They were returning to the city between tour tend 6 ocluok ID the morning and when near the Hot Bpilugi were rt Nituars k arrested by Roberts and locked up In the city jall 1 and kepi there for eight I l hours No charge was ever pie erred I against them at lent they were never I < brought trial ih lloberis claimed that be tested 1 this men under orders from Captain Ij Ujnovau who bad been Instructed l mm tbficene waiby Chief Pratt 10 hold them The CDBO arminat DoooVlu wall dismissed yesterday the t eudanls moving for a lion tun to which plaint contented Chief Prattle defense was tbat the men were up to ice Smith with a view of mak log arrangement with blut la trial the Hue wllb aid I from the tome riservo11 Before bo could Ret 10 Ibo city to prefer a charge tbe In junction was raised |