Show THE BRIBERY CASE I 1 It Occupies the Time ol JnuDe Rohpp Today I CAHOON 0V TIIF hlTNtinSSLtust j Uliir ATllnnsst IxsmlncdiiU for i StenO In JuJgn lltrrrii Coin I Other Court JUtUrs The trial of ex County Comml loner Joseph 11 Morris occupied the attention of Judge Rolanp and the jury lu the criminal division of the Third dlttriot court today the time being spent lu the lamination and crosfeexamlnallon ot willie for Ibo defense The principal witness was I Commltsloner John 1 Gaboon the I other wllneBSet being Charles Itelch Ilobart Mulhall and Chariot Van Hal i stlne5 whose testimony elicited nothing but what nan been brought 1 out In former trIal In Ibo cross I examination of Mr Gaboon an attempt I at-tempt was made to show that neither I the whore nor flurry Mayors had overlaid navtulug for the furniture I that was put into the Murray opera home which wee owned jointly by laces two partIes Mr Cahoon elated i that he bad not and that be did not know that Mr Hayueaor anyone else 1 had ever done to The quettlon at too to-o whether wltntsa had beard Mr Hayes elate that be had nol paid anything lathe furniture company or 111 agent was objected to and the ob lection sustained whereupon the pros caution asked that a uUI < DOa issue for Harry Jlaynes and that ho bo brought Into court Further queallonlng brought out the statement tnat no advertisement had nr bn mad fr bid fur furnishing the building and In tact that no attempt I at-tempt had been made to get figure J from coy furniture company or dealer I except from Aft 10 Co through I their agent liaykon and he had went through the building and made i II1 lldlgbo rg an estimate of what In tots oilnlon I was needed and reeonUid It to the oommlBtloners Alter Blenogripher Pike had con eluded the leading of bit ateuograpblo nolet In the Morris bribery ease the prosecution called E W Donate County Attorney Whlttemorc It It Anderson and II V Meloy as wit noises to make formal proof of the Isiuance of Ibo warrants tu Andrews di Co In layment for tho furnlturo bull other points Two letters written by lbs defendant Morris to Haykeu were alec ollered lu evidence Bulb wore written lu June 1896 and In Ibm liayken Is I auuied I 1111 roe berm eon come 10 the booed he represented or any one olio ou account ci the furulturo contract and adus You aiushuwu to lo a Rood salesman hoe houu gets good pr tea and Bait Lake count I ayi the fiddler becauee ut the veidaucy of Its reprt seutatlvea that la tile lone and Ohio d holt 01 It and liD one gets eacrillcod except Bait babe county In paying I the expenseg ol Mr Whlltemoie Mr Weary and Ibo Investigation gen I I i orally F W Blratton was then put on the Bland with the en edition of eliciting same Important testimony Irom him I I but bit leallraany was objected to by counsel for the defense and the only Information obtained Irom him was that be was Illdenl of Chicago and j that he we peymastsrfor Andrewe to f Co when the contract fur the turn I lure was entered Into and had charge of the nitenta accounts with the flm Tho defence opoi ed by roaktnt a motion for a non sulf which wee overrule John H Uolaney was then called and tctlino I that he had met Hayken at the Kuulaford hotel and that the latter had asked him rome qurttlons shun I the Fronds mine which Morris claims to have Bold 10 9109 keD Alter bloc croic diamlnatlon of Ua laiey an JJourumeut was taken until this mnolog |