Show So AS TO clltllfll TIUIIIISMH CD 190 W 111111tor I > eem Etenlrw News In make set dlaervtnellt between Iwo WB t IIfllOn ono ol uhini Ick I 101 i il rhttrt tile 1 M = 10ItoIlinteliftelit for note oila 4 I 1 mfootried to u Church Net tripaskinerent saukuniga k t decades Ili t she 0 wit Ch eel I ineentser turnill it rvqt6 till ly IHIII 11 r i thi r Iw that lia I will Inith abide by th lclunT If a Clear j h member has tendered klr I it voinchurtil Intimater or It a man ii hurcn member Ions I a financial claim tat as WnloMr auto to nall till the San turn I Church tneiiiw r no l can fee have Mefth complalnl i hard by a Church trit Iin mens TrttirunalT I > < 10011 In o huh tribunal are witnesses I as who IM to are IrallfyT 11IAChurch members T wries I to Its Asian In replying lo the foregoing Inqulrle we rto nnt intend i nay anything thai 410ay would Interlrro wit IFS that may I-FS bay liecn ivmlervtl on limits matter In any of file Slash ol Zion I The learil dealer end I lllgllouncll I of racl Stake = r = Ird are time Soldiers tot their limit procedure at He sad ilrcumalnncw may tender It rall I nary nr wise to adopt method that MAY nd lap I filter In ume ruapeot fiom tegular nelornosm rule In Other i nee It would bit feet n AprV tit tar In I our uiilnloli for level nhu di else Informallon u n such IHIIH no ar van few met < to presented In the masons teller lu ublaln 0 W U from th towel I nuihiilil who L lllctl Probably tinderaland better than any lmwcloetl nature ol a cat local In lie lock t character m on I byte Usually It It not cuatomary for I Icka Church tribunal to adjudicate came In which time parties or either of them O U Are out ol ilm church Certainly toy Ili to-y relah rent nonraemUr line no claim whatever book 11 Pon Ih KrMrm 1 ol u Illnhol court oo 0111 rlllalu vimekl t in lel11111 legal is with 0 i hlt It lnvle in I 191110 Ilia tl oiy to 1 III Il 1 Cl tit Ilea IV ortatl it lit 1 1 I I I J I or autho it alliance am res A 11 N Ill a I I I c tit or tile I 1IIIb < 0 II > C 11111 I UN f a by Jtatko a uI 1 I I I I I 11 1 0 1 I I I 1 t t I II I Worth Il I n11 n tn r I lli x r d It I cloth 110 member hiirrh nil urnl case rr the rlM I 1 1 li it ri And d 1M Church A 0 religious I body If a Church member has elandered n onChurch member the Injured Party ha oil the aliphatic and privilege which IM secular law I provides to obtain re d me and eo with n financial Claim be may gagi Hut hurch lrlbun1i an not maintained to Mitt iuarvele 1 IP I wnl n nmtmembrn may be implicated nor lo collecl 1 their account Such per anna Hun no rkrllon In Ik matter Ae > nil nan murrli member at not permitted to trill In ce of bargain agra lnet 1 Church number before ny Church tribunal II mormis to in IIMI nil this ehouM Iw obvious la any on who know any hlng nbuel the order and dledplln if the Church ol Jew Christ of Sees > erday ami |