| Show JACIxSOX ISI Im IOSKIt hniirenw Court Declared Acahl Illin 111 Cromi 1iilni Cnm > Th opinion of the Uuinme court In I the calls of c M I JaraMn va the frown Point Mlnlw fo apiillnta wa hand od down yaalerday II ravra the rollng of lin lower onurt to aald the loorpostual l Inlunttlon given hi the lower court and rnui di the casse with In alrucUnn Dial ju lanxnl b I tendered In Ilse deiondiiil I nvr The came w t I FPUII to restrain th defndani I B u aale ot the IIdamtapa i i lHalntlfri al > < I a llmiunl 1 aiaraa ment umounllnr 11 I llirev verato a liar I Th claim of the plaintiff wa llltlho board of dlriHlora wa not Imally con alltuM IKOUO lit the rut that on Ft H 1 laquen article of Iniornora lion war amndij by lh bash by which the number of dlnitora was In crotithadfrom Photon ti title thill annual nt not having bover filed with tn ec ivtary of Hat mull ml > l < hZ A period of about time inonlh editor the namtit was levied l Hi iitvi jdI I tl o trial use tn dIIn favored he 11lnlltr RI 1 rdvred the lo I UCO ot the Injunction II Is I now ItOld by the Supercold court that the tit fondant Is I ITIMppcol tn objecting 10 if validity 01 Ih bilard I ul Mrsulars or or the avaoaimeiil for the ioa on mat Iw nocpl th thnng In the board and K ahoweil by val a ug for the nlii dlMdora lie alo acknowledged llulr 1 authority later by turning rertmiat I of lock and hating the lock test erred fn of the elements at ih prevl u > iiwnar to hill own came The court hold further that aa lo the failure to file the amendment until aft r lie an amamtnt waa tovfed tile mutation was d 1s1dw46MJ T ti not fundamental Justice llatkln wrote the opinion Chief Jiuilto llutliil and Jutlc lllner concurring |
