| OCR Text |
Show MOM IN M'tlium. Tnr woman aullrngu till which le-cently le-cently pael tbe New York aatttubly by aioteor Ot toll Kadi at folhnt "An Act lo prtrent dlrcrlmliiallon on account uf hex at election!. 'The people or tbe Mate of N ew . ork. rrpteacnted In aeuale and ataembty, do enact aa followa , "eetloti I L ery elllieti Irreaixctire of atx ahall hermitler lteenlllle.1 to vote for all an 1 overy onleor bereaferto bo eittxeel In Ibla Nine, an 1 ou any qncmlon a.ibniiue.1 toaeite of the people, and It ahall, laa unlawful In tnako any dltrrlinhi-atloulMlweeneltlieca dltrrlinhi-atloulMlweeneltlieca on aeicounl of tex at tuch elevtion. Hretlont No iolt tleik, Inapector of ehtlouor other eleill tu oricer or per-ton per-ton htllllllnR auch diillee aball hctenfler reruaulolealalerortorewehe lliovole ot an a lull citizen at any tuch election by renaoti ot tha tx of auch cltlreu, I ro-Tl.l.-l aurh citizen MI In all other rea-IMtcta rea-IMtcta iMacat tbe iultucutloua now re-ipilre-d by 1 iw. Hecllon 3. Tbla act aball tal.efH.-ct July, I Met. Tbla bill la now Leforo theBenatr, Uitlntplte of tho gtowlng Inlluencta In IU lavor It la not likely te It como a law at preaent. rrijudlcu la an un-reatonlng un-reatonlng force and rtqulree lime and rogreaa to ovrcomo It. , omen them-telvra them-telvra are not united In demanding It, and tbla la contidereUn oteut argument argu-ment agalntt It. IU fallacy It latily txpotcd, for It la evident that no per-ton per-ton thould be deprived of a right which he Juitly clalma Ltcaum another an-other doea not want It, but reaaon cult very little figure wheu cutloni aud rrjudtcerevall. |
