| OCR Text |
Show $20,000 DAMAGES CLAIMED. Fw Injnrlcj Sustained VThlla Ycik-1n Ycik-1n In a Mice Kear Patk City. VEnillCT 1.1 TI1K "rtoMinitASIl" IIA)IAIIL CAM'. Treolilo our a llnlhllnj Conlricl. A Caio lli.inla.nl Million! rrrjinllrc Hlcellanrool Iluilnoi. The tint raae on trial In Ju.ljre Ander.n'a court thla tnornliiK waa that of John 0. Uudelberg vi. the C'rricent Mining Co. Th action waa brought to recover damage In lb turn of $2.1,00), for peraonal Injurlea. Tlm plalnllir waa rrpreeented by Mrein. llrowu and Henderaon; Menre. Zitio and 1'ulnam ni'l cored for tho defendant cominy. Home little tlm waa occupied In un-panellnitajury. un-panellnitajury. Th plalnllft Ii about 27 yenra of arjc, and 111 Dtoembtr, 18)7, waa lu the employ of the dcfendanta( a n ItViorer and carman In their allverand lead mine ellual near l'ark City. It waa alleged tlut the plalntlfl on Decemler Sttli, In the year aliove named, waa ordered Ly th eMIlere In thn company' aorvlce,to go Into n rail on Iho mine ground and cleau out dirt therefrom. Further, It waa alated that the plilntirt waa uimciiualntiM with tbo locality; that tbo ralau waa Improperly Im-properly and Iniuntclenlly llmlered, und that while woiLIiir Iheroln th grr.und iioovb caved In A lart;e quautlly of earth fell upon hla and lio waa badly Injured, lib) left lee; waa cruthed nnit amputation of Iho entire llmliliad lo lx rnmrled to. Hurirlral Ireitmcnt necetaltaled an ilpendl. ture of tome -')'W, and plalntllt de-chrrd de-chrrd that In coniequetic of th eerloua nature ufhli Injurlea ho haa u Or ml greatly, and la ttlll unable to en lliu livelihood. Th defendant! aniwer by deny-Ins deny-Ins that the plaintiff waa uot requited, by hi dutlea, to enter tho raleea, wlntef, or itoi-ea of the mine, tut Inil.t that It waa hla duty to wtik In whatorrr art of them III) aer-vice aer-vice wer needel. Denial ll alto Klvetitotb alienation that Iho rata waaln.ulllcleutlyconfttructed and tlm-tiered; tlm-tiered; on thanluer html, Itliauerted that everything round about .waerafo aud lu Kood repair. f The cae promise) lo occupy tbo whole day. TIIB ACTIOX JIUA1N8T "tVONOEII-IjAIHR". "tVONOEII-IjAIHR". In tho action brought by L'barlra A. Hlolu agalmt J.I. rlackitt and William Wil-liam Lawler to recover $o03f) damagea on account of an aaaaultand hlaalleced unlawful nnd forcible ejecltoii fioni "WonderlanJ," In April of last year, thejury (to wlioui thucaee wa. Klven latt. laiteveolui:)ttilaiiiornln)(brouibt in a rcled verdlvt flualug lor the plalu-tirii plalu-tirii damage fl'IO. Iliat'UlH OVKH A IIUII.VIX'I CWNlr.ACT. In Jitdgo ano'a court tho action brought by Hatntiel Hefty (for whom Moldwlni Tatlock ap.iar.d) as.liut David lllatkhurat waa tried without ft Jury. Tho defendant'-counael waa Mr. VanUott. Tbo claim amounted to IK) W, pilnclpal aud Interest duo on building contract. The plalulllT'a case waa that In tho year leo'l, at tbn roiunt of th defendant, defend-ant, Le furnlihed material aud labor In connection with certain Improvement on Mr. HUckliurit' new houiu In Karmert preolnct, Halt Lake county. Tbo actual valuo of. th wurk waa illl.oU, the leuialiiTng M Lvelng for lutereit on thla nmouut. The defendant, defend-ant, In hla answer, tela forth that certain cer-tain porllonauf tho work were negligently negli-gently and Impropeily done, and put in a counter claim lu eicera of Iho claim. Tho cue waa lu progre'i at noon Ilia HKVllt -.NIK11 IT. In tho matter of Halt l.iko City vi. William ljiwrencc, owing lo the death of the defendant the caao waa ordered stricken from the docket. The defendant waa aomo time ngo convicted con-victed In thu police court on n charge of vai;ranoy,.aud Ihlstasucauivupon hla appeal. llIalllSKKl). Halt Dako City vs. Judion I1, Fowler. On motion of Judge Jloge, lor the plulntilT, the caa waa dlaml-aod. THU AIJ WITHOUT I'lll'JUDICK. In tli action brousht by Jamea Clowry ngalnat tho Voteni Union Tilcgroph comny, which waa lo have lie.n tried toily In Judge Kao.'a court, the plalnllir now moved for a lioslpouenieut. which motion waa overruled, over-ruled, and the case wai dlsmla-ed without prejudice. Yesterday atleruooti thu defendant cumtuiny'a demurrer to thu complaint waaoverrulid. The plalutlU alleged that whllo employed a. n aectlou bos. on the Jtlo Oraudo Western railway at Cisco In Beptember, 1843, a bundle ol wlr IvIoUKlug to tbo company waa thrown from n freight car In such h manner as ti strike blm aud break bis leg In eevrrel places. It alio appeared that a claim which h had asalntt lb railroad rempatiy for the sani accident had beeu aettlml by blm for 91. On tin the company were prepared to lay co uslderablo stress. |
