Show I EICHNOR ATTACKS THE THEORY O OF OP THE DEFENCE District Attorn Attorney y Eichnor punctured the theory of or U tl the n aa h 5 James R. R Hay was d with ith cold logic c and keen ridicule He took up each circumstance and showed how bow it formed a alink link in the iron chain that that YS for fOt the defence fence had tried to ic break Where Is the Gun I III In answer to the question Where is the gun Mr 11 Eichnor asked the Jury to remember that the defendant had thirty six h urs the the start of the offic officers rs and i If Ie the gun had been produced pro pro- they would have raised the same cry they did about the shovel The same of the blood The defendant ant was too intelligent nt a man to leave any traces ot oL blood oh on his clothing or ox- about his premises How easy to dispose of a agun agun agun gun Mr I Eichnor went over the contradictory contradictory tory statements of or the defendant about the money In the jars the way Hay carried the money and Hays Hay's statement to him when he was alleged to have come caine after the money The decision in the criminal case ease he said would have no bearing whatever on the Pacific Lumber company's claim to the which would have to be tried in a civil court regardless of l conviction conviction con con- or acquittal Defends His Witnesses Charles and Richard Watkins had be been bean n on th the stand The defence had maligned and impugned them but on cros n no no attempt was made to prove pro malice or Interest If It Stewart art was a Napoleon when he was examining James Sharp he was a a Don Quixote when he exam examined ex ex- am ned Charles and Richard Watkins The Cannon check Was sas waved aloft by the District Attorney as he queried quer quer- led During nealy two days of argument argument ment meat by Barnard Stewart and C. C B. B Stewart Stewart did you hear one word about the Cannon check Theres the very check Peter Mor got from John M. M Cannon in included included in- in eluded in his statement to Chief Hilton and afterward handed to Charles Charie Wat- Wat kins Sorrow in Widows Widow's Home In reply In-reply reply to Mr Stewarts Stewart's eloquent picture of the children of the defendant Mr Mi sl I. asked d the jurors to imagine imagine imagine im im- im- im agine themselves if they acquitted the defendant meeting the widow taking her by the hand and sa saying We acquitted acquitted acquitted ac ac- ac- ac quitted the defendant because we had hada a reasonable doubt going to the grave of oC James Jarne R. R Hay putting their theil hands hands' handson on the lowly mound and saying We Ve had a reasonable doubt placing their hands on the heads beads of the three little children and saying We Ve acquitted acquit acquit- ted Peter because we had a reasonable doubt doub that he murdered your father The impeaching witnesses against Allen MIen the financial statement James Sharps Sharp's testimony and the meaning of ofa ofa ofa a reasonable doubt were discussed by Mr Eichnor during the remaining hour of the On the latter subject subject sub sub- Sect he warned the jurors against he he excuse I know he Is guilty but thE they didn't prove It It saying flaying It was proved If they knew In Ir their own consciences that the de defendant was guilty |