| Show Hi S n < inlli rfi < UAro l CVlVKIANI 0 Kept 18The I Jjiudir publUbti the following fdl toilall The Loulitllle OjurlerJutirnal of eairrday contained l mi tullonal lu which that Ialr loujlil to explain III action In wlthilrawlin fruni the AMO clalwl 1rmi and aim tried to eicuio the oonntction of Mr lluldraiaii HJB owner of the VoutlcrJournal wllli the Untied Pram Jlr Hlclitrd rimllh atone at-one lime a proniloout owntr of thu Llncliiuitl Commercial Uuztte Ira nlM willton an omen letter l lire Intent ul which woo tu tlvmoral the Acm claleJ tina Mrott llalilimiin arid Hmllh were for a umt many yein ai Iho louln Title ItourrfcrVourful itatcw the tluitti UliecloK and two of tire memum 01 tnroaotcu hive eoniinllteo of tire Writ tin Awwclatril 1rci and while acting lu that capacity they mod nuclei coiilttct with the United 1riti uiiiltr which all the name of tho Western Awoclattd Irtm was tollTuinl to tire United riiiinactlcilly without com i Ieoeailon Two ycit ago whim the raemhin of the Auocluted irac UlicoTered tire lluatlon AI lr > in HaUeiuau ant an-t were rillrml from the board ot dlrritors I and executive oaniniltteu and the unfair oontract woo abrogated by the i ew unurit It waa illiojvcred that MtHti lliUeman and Hmllh cant Iia4 JAOOUD ol United 1riM took whlcli irMa abtolulely worthliu until the nceut contract wai made The abrugatlon of thuooutiact lIlh txtwluK of the ilnal li I wliut lent lo the i rupture between thu two nunclatloni the eoulMt now being determine whether wi2KllierlUK nhall be man Olld by tire trewepal > en th mielr i OC by a look corporation which li I not ointrollej by I tire > uullihrri of new Ijr r WbutBTcr may ha the outcome of lire prciiriit ooutroTiriy u loin a bilceors llalahIb and Hnlltb each liold PhD 100 ci Uullod 1reii stock for wiilch nothlUK was rwilj rouuuon dicnuc t leui rniiltc < that they ibouia rcmalu 11 |
