Show WINS WINS' I BEER LAW SUIT became cf- cf ef law Jaw V f liquor Utah new than two months before be be- moro more proclaimed in operation opera opera- tore fore It was as don tion by Governor Henry k H. H Blood court ruled Wednes' Wednes Wednesday Wed Wed- state supreme the the settling a beer tax coni controversy con con- controversy In nes' nes daY the Becker Products Prod Prod- Products b between tween i of Ogden and the company compan Mato tax commission law Jaw went into held the f f The rho court effect affect on March 25 1935 when it the governor instead wis was signed by of of t on Juno June 1 1935 when he proclaimed pro pro- Justice D D. Ba claimed it in operation W. W V. V Moffat wrote the opinion with Justice James H Wolfe Volle dissenting 5 The decision upheld tho the contention contention conten conten- contention tion tion of tho Becker company which paid ld beer taxes razes for April and May 1 1935 5 on the ba basis ls of tho the low Jow rates of the new law Jaw The Tho tax commission assessed the compa the difference between the new rates and tho the old higher rat rates 3 of ot the beer control act of ot 1933 on the tho grounds the new act actu Was u as not operative until June 1 1935 The Becker company then appealed to the high court Justice Moffat pointed out where v there is an irreconcilable conflict Ivl between two statutes the latest enactment of tho the legislature con con- |