| Show VUIU nciuuiLM ASH nous IT Ooe or the flnlRuni asalni the flee arid bill Ii I find bl Ih Uetiujai men In the form ol a prolei jalml lbe withdrawal ol the bounty halt year and a noble that Ihe UciUI Blatti government will be road a fitly defendant In h a lull for damajei There an lit beet auger tactortee In the Uulld ll Hlatee One bat l hell Utah ono each at Norfolk and Und Maud Nekrae ai and Hirf In California The Nebraska Ne-braska factory manageri a itatud In I the dltpatcIlM alien that Ilia withdrawal with-drawal 01 the bounty will ruin UK tuiluen Into which liar hat put a vast amount of money The Calllor rlla factories propose to mike o strong fjhl for the yinent of the bouuty thus year claiming that the goTern maul ba nlerd Into a contract will him which CongreM cannot annul Ai for Ib other auger factorlei teens were limed to Idem for IbOl under Ibe o4 law I and they eulurJ Into contract with the UI grower lunuitlt thereto Tbe Ilcenig for the year eulborliei Ibm to produce beet mjir at I IWO cui a pound duty but under the new law I Ibo luttr lntctora ate being withdrawn with-drawn which Ii I nolle that the bounty will not Le paid fh1I111 Up taken by the California faotoili U t to protest > etalDU Ib withdrawal with-drawal ol the li > icton rile bu been don the claim being it up by the auger mn that the wlthdiawil Ii 1 a breach of lha contract until I not autborltid by the hew law I Ot court the loilllon ol the revenue tdlceii 10 l that Conicini lui anuullcd the con I IncH and It Ii I upon tbli rupo illlon that the legal proceed lUll ite lo La taken The sugar men claim that II tbUconilrucllon U I correct then the new law I Ii unconilU tutlonal that rtpect It being retro actlv lu III 0ect upon the oontracti and therefur ol the ctiti 01 cr pod oofo leglilillon forbidden by the Con itltutlou Acting upon Ibli view of the cue the three CallfornU reflnerlei bn oomllln and hat engaged legil talent Auellortlito U loads tall In Cougreii and before tbo Uulltd Htatei court ot claim Tb bounty paid on tech sugar tail i yeiramouultdlo JW1748 Of Ilili turn Utah rtcelTed JJ76I XebraiV ll880t and California 04576981 Thut It will be teen that the Uoldci ilau factorlee ate very heavily IlIler tiled The Ion lo the Utah factory through Ibe repeal of the old law of r coune will I bo larger than tbo bounty paid lut year ai It limpeeled there will be a larger output of iiiRar 1 lull leaion thin nor before The Lull dory bowvrer doe not ooulvniplalti any other courie thou runulug full opacity and delng raha bOIl It can Whether or not It will be financially lucoeuful tbli year without the bounty can b > flturtd up at Ibo cloie of the soon Ai to thu meat ordemerlli of bouutyijtiteui we baT no dlicuiilon 1Ys merely with lo record nol < that are In proil M and to point out the fact thai while the lunar beet acreage U I larger thl year than nil the Kebraika manufacturer claim they are being ruined by the gOTuruniiut and the California mater propon U have 0 heal fight for the bounty but the Utah factory but ieltll down la work without grumbling or iiuarrellng determined lo rutkn a aucccx on IU own merlU acid from outside aid II 1 Ibe people lure will ruablo It to iu eo by itandlng by It ai they euould |
