| Show Firit IIMrict Court baturday alloruoon 1nsldent Whit mon of the 1irst Nalloiui ibid 01 Kephl 1lId1 lo the oaa of 1k M Head vs the Klrl Nail nil Hawk of Nbl alter whloh the csie was ar > Itud by rouoael 11 was submitted the tory this morning AUIIFID ON A vniDior Sn < MIHiutti < tMrJMiml Ttltirtfk 1Huvu Utah Nov nAI 131 ochxk Olin jury brought u verdict lu favor of ilalntm I Kr 3M99C lOIn Jurats concurred lu the verdln The next case called waa O Iver A hole YO Harry K Haya sIll Albert Hay The subject 01 the tonlroversy Is I 011110 > t51O loll of lot 4 In section 20 lowmhlp fl south range 1 east ou the side of Utah Lake 1lalnlltl claims tint h took IOea5hnn of Iho land which waa unoiculed guvmuieiit laud In IBbtf and made Improveraenle and look uecassuy steps ID secure a title lo Ihe laud In I6U lie allowed one of the plaintiffs to slop at Ills plaoe while heweotluLehl a lerhla return Ut feiidaula relused lo allow him lo come 01110 tbe laud anj bold possets u or his houie 1 lie uefeuso Is Ihal defend ante are not ou laluillla land and Oh1 t Ihe laud I they cccupy la not Olin lo clalmd desirlbel plalntllT Anna Marks aud Wool MarIa vi John f Hulllvan bearing of uiollun for new trial cud tMetax out sailor 630 oclock Nov H h rue oae of T O IImis vs Halvator Li llua via dismissed al 1 plalutlUa OJlt ill I Olca cue ot Ihe MarseCoe Shoe Co Yo J U Ulark el 1 alJul 1 < menl by iMtueeit for plalulllls for t S29 and coin coA Klsber Ilrewlng Co TS John Mo ANy 01 al Ii on nullon of plilntltla tuuusel aatlsficlloii of JuJ < ment lu lavorol plalutlll wu set Mid The case I Ihe 1eople vs All Sing assault with a dsadly weao W4S slrlckeu folIo 1 Iho t u resent scltlng 01 J i 3 t laist ou mulDnof defeudaiita couf 0 |
