Show Saturdays Saturday's football Schedule J Aberdeen v. v Huron Aberdeen Adrian v. v Detroit Coll Coli Adrian Adrian- Akron Itron v. v Wallace Baldwin Akron Alabama v. v Ag As- Tuscaloosa Alabama Poly v. v Tulane Montgomery Allegheny v. v Waynesburg Mead lima Alma Aima v. v Kalamazoo Alma Ainia Arizona V. V N. N Mex Me A. A 8 s M. M I. I Tucson Tu son Assumption C. C v. v Toledo Toledo Sandwich San J Ont Onto Baylor v. v Texas A. A i M M. Waco Vaco v. v Coe Coo Beloit Boston Coil Coll v. v Providence Boston Bowdoin v Bates Brunswick Bradley v Peoria Brown v. v Dartmouth Providence Butler v. v Ro Rose Bose e Poly roly Indianapolis Cal Tech v. v Red lands Pasadena Catholic Univ v. v Quantico Washington Washinton Centre v. v Univ Kentucky Chattanooga v. v Se aneo Chattanooga Chicago v. v Purdue Chicago Cincinnati v v. Dayton Cincinnati Clarkson v v. Rensselaer Potsdam Colby v. v Marne C C. C. C N N. Y V Hamilton New Y ric Coil Coll Emporia v v. v Baker Coll Coil Idaho v. v weli Colorado Mines v. v Colorado Golden Goiden Columbia v. v Cornell Corneil Polo Grounds Columbia Coil Coll v. v Valparaiso Dubuque ConcordIa v. v St St. Johns John's Moorhead Conn Agri v. v Manhattan Storrs Davidson v v. N N. Carolina State Stale Davidson DePauw v. v Franklin Greencastle Dickinson v. v Albright t Carlisle C rl le v. v N. N Y Philadelphia Dubuque que v. v Luther Luthers e uheI Dubuque I Duke Dule v. v Richmond Durham I Evansville v. v l-I l Hanover nover Evansville I Florida v. v Rollins Gainesville Fordham v. v N. N Y Univ Yankee Stadium I v. v Lancaster Furman v. v Presbyterian Coil Coll Greenville Georgetown Georgetown v. v King Washington Georgetown 2nd v. v Union Georgetown Geo Gee Wash Yuh v. v Wash ash Coil Coll Washington Georgia Georgia- Tech v v. v Notre Dame Atlanta Glenvilla v v. v Shepherd Gonzaga v. v Haskell Spokane Gustavus Adolphu v. v St. St Olaf St Peter v v. Lawrence St St. Paul Sidney Hampden-Sidney v v- Sydney P. Harvard v V. William Cambridge i v. v Olivet Hillsdale Holy Cross v. v Bucknell II Worcester Illinois Coil Call v. v Monmouth Jacksonville I Indiana v v. Northwestern rt BloOmington n Iowa v. v Wabash abash b 1 Jowa City I I James v v. Indiana Nor Decatur Jamestown v. v Dakota Yea Wee Jamestown John Carroll v. v Detroit Cleveland I JunIata v. v Susquehanna Huntingdon Kansas v. v Drake Lawrence Knox v. v Cornell Coll Coli Galesburg Lafayette v. v St. St Bonaventure jn Lehigh v. v Muhlenberg Muhl n erg Bethlehem Louisiana State v. v Arkansas Shreveport Loyola v. v Lombard Chicago Loyola v. v New Orleans I Macalester v. v Ca St. St Paul Marquette v. v CreIghton Crelghton Milwaukee I Maryland l v. v North Carolina Baltimore I McKendree v. v West est Teachers McPherson v. v Friends McPherson Mercer v. v The Augusta S Miami r D v Denson onCIl II Dayton i Michigan v v. v U. U S. S av Acad Ann Arbor ArborI I Michigan Agri v. v Colgate Hast East Lansing MIddlebury v. v St. St Stephens Minnesota v. v Wisconsin Mississippi Coil Coll v. v Howard Clinton Missouri v. v Iowa State Slate Columbia Morningside d y V. V Des Moines Sioux City City i alt Mt Union f V. V Casa a X Alliance I Nebraska y Oklahoma ma Lincoln Nevada v. v Santa Clara Reno New ew Hampshire v. v Tufts fun Durham N. N Dak Dale v. v N. N Dal Dak Dalt Agri Grand Fork Northwestern North v. v Lake Forest Norwich v. v Vermont Northfield Oberlin v. v Rochester Oberlin Ohio Northern v. v Ohio Univ Ada Ohio Ohl State Stale v v. v Woo Wooster ter Columbus Ohio Wesleyan v. v Wittenberg Delaware g h 11 A. A M. M i. i v. v Stillwater III Otterbein v. v Hiram Pacific Univ v. v Coil Coll PugH Sound Forest Grove Pennsylvania v v. v Illinois Philadelphia Andover y Yale Is Andover Piedmont v. v J est Demo Pittsburg v. v Johns Hopkins Pittsburg Pomona v. v California Los Angeles Princeton v v. Princeton Rice v. v Southwestern Houston Ho ton Rutgers v. v Penn MII Iiii Brunswick St. St Johns John's v. v Gallaudet Annapolis St. St Johns John's v. v Villanova Brooklyn St. St Lawrence v. v Hobart Canton Sf St Louis Univ v. v v. v Mo Mines lines St Sl Louis St. St Marys Mary's v. v Univ Cal So o Br Berkeley St. St Thomas v. v Neb Wes St. St Paul raul St. St Viator Vialor v. v Wes Yes Bourbonnais St. St Xavier v. v Kenyon Cincinnati Y San n Jose Teachers Jose Teachers rec v v. v r ro Faa Pao o c Coil Coll li San Jose Simpson v. v Parsons Parson a I Sioux Falls v. v Yankton ton SI oI Sioux Falls N So flak Dale v. v So Dais DaJ State Slate Vermillion So Methodist t v v. Texas Dallas Southwestern I v. v Fairmount o i S S. W. W Louisiana v. v La Coil Coll Lafayette Springfield v. v Boston Univ Springfield Stanford 1 v. v Oregon Palo Alto Stetson v. v Spring Hill Deland Stevens v. v Delaware Hoboken Syracuse v. v Penn State Syracuse Talladega v. v Morris Brown Talladega D v. v Missouri Valley Tarkio Temple v v. Lebanon Valley Philadelphia Tennessee ee v. v Georgia Knoxville Texas Shines s v. v N. N Mexico Mil Mu El El EI Paso Thil Thiel v. v Geneva Greenville Tr Transylvania v. v Louisville Lexington Tusculum v v. v Weaver feaver Tu Tusculum culum V. V S S. Mil lOll Acad v. v Yale New Haven U Upper per Iowa v. v Iowa Wesleyan Fayette Upsala v v. v Brooklyn Law East Orange Ursinus v. v Gettysburg v v. v Mississippi Nashville Virginia v. v Charlottesville Va 1 Mil ll met vs ss Lynchburg Lexington x Wake Waite I Forest o v. v G m f Wake Forest Wash State v. v Washington Pullman Wash Vash v. v Bethany v v. Trinity West AVest Sid Rd v. v St. St Francis Westminster Western No Xo v. v K Ky Wes Yes Winchester Western Vestern Reserve v. v Heidelberg Cleveland Westminster v. v Grove City New v Wilmington W. W Va Univ v. v Wash Wash V W. VI Va We Wes Wee vs VI Elk Davis Buckhannon I Whittier v. v Occidental S Williams v. v U tilon Worcester A. A v. v Ph Phillips II Ii liS Ex Poly v v. v R n I. I Slate RIal Yale v. v U. U S. S Military Aced New ew da c on I |