Show TUG 1IU3UANU XSWtns Co f Cotlrell ltpll lo lilt > lfci llltorco ooipUliit and Illet Uno on Ills Unit Arcouit In Ills divorce lull of Anna Cottrell vi C I Cottrell the defendant Ills mornlnfln the cilice of the Third dlitrlct oourt mod hli answer to the wHo complaint lubitantlally deny tog III herlle tattoo Ho aiyi that i be tsar not been In Ihe habit or III treating her or calling her vile namei that bo hai not been guilty of drunk enucn that lie li I not putowm of tan and alialtacrei of land at llouutlful l Iltvli county of the vales of J20 < Hi Lutofoulyoriaand a half cre thli Iwlug worth not moro than J250 or 00 ito Ie not lIu further slate wurlh JWlor HW worth at 1erousl property but adman owning lhlitfcuraharei ollltalllvii MlnlnK c jany ttioi Ho dot not bo drclaren hold a JM0 ruarlgigo for projerty In Halt Like the tamo being now lilOltoll in collateral security for borrowed unney hI a or N l1IpIAlol the defendant alliKii inucli Uonufllo neglect on III wiles lull Italia that she hunt fali lo provide totem has nyiteraallcally abused Isle cuiiomtr and driven Hum awuy Irom hli LUcumllh hop by IniuIlluK them and calling foul them 0atuec that silo 1i I 01 n vldoai Awl l iinKovtrnabl temper and by her oulrageout ciLduct bat almost de troredhli budneii I HOlleo lie prays slut she take notli Ing by her complaint but ash Hut hv grunted a divorce and that lire plulutlll bo denied alimony and all claim In the property Judge Iljwnian U the UofcnJnnli attorney |