Show LEGAL MATTERS Supremo Court Decision Handed Down Yesterday Afternoon catiicu ctsis Mir FOIL run isih The Ogden liar tram Only Tito Corn rnIOllonnXo Cnmo for Action A Itfurul Ely Tire opinion In the MoKlbbcn cue wai read by Julia Miner the appeal being from the lliltd DUttlct court Henry C Haarillok Ibo plaintiff ml 1 ligti that before tho doth of Sire I McICIbben the agreed to sell to him I Hllahareiof I the capital took of the HI Louie and Mlialtalppl Valley Tranapottnllon Company for 12509 end Iho oiler wn aoctpted lu willing before Ibo contract had expired Sire McKlbbcn died and tier executor ru Iud to deliver Ibo dock hones the suit In the lower court Judgment wai given 1 In the mm of 11435 r and lu the ileclilon of the tuprtniacouil Judgment was allrmed A HIIVKIUUL In the csee 01 Prank Jungk et al 1 TI D C Heed the plaintiff appealed from the dcclilon of the Klrit Dlilrlct court Judge declilon Tbo defeudnnta In this ouuse had delivered to plalntlHi Ihreoproinli curs notea aggregallng 7000 A claimof fraud was lit yp bylhitde lendanla In that ont Boost who was trot a party to the lull wont Into part nuriblp with them Dilng at the aima time a partner of Ilin pltlnllflf and ptrtuaded them to enter Into a contract con-tract with Use plalntllTt fur the do livery of certitii heel They wire Hi oblo 10 deliver tine aheepand ai plullillfli claimed tliat they bad been damaged the soles were given to nlrnlurio them A number num-ber of errors were found In the record of the lower court and tho Hiiprerae Court rendered the dcclidun Justices Miner and JIaHcli concurred AS io tnix The rp1 of llyimn Harrlr In the liairla v > Clilpmau coo a uictlon Was revimd In favor ol Iho defendant defen-dant and was road by Judge Miner hula ogee WI heard In Ibo Third Uli irlcl court and wni brought ta re writ 8700 paid on purchase price of ccrlaln prcmuei for which difendautngreed to KIVO good and uniclent tlllu tone given time The plululllli claim the title wee dollcllvo and hens mod to recover lire amount paid Tbo court bold that the title was good and bronco denied the appeal NO CAUSH OK ACr tON Letter T ltori appellant TI Jennie V Thoiupion sl ul appeal from Ihe Third UlitrtctuouiU JudgeZanorenderedtbooplulon In he toe whlcu Involve A oue fourth luttrtit In the Contlmntal hotel and adjoining irottrly valutd at Wuuu In the lower court the claim wanitl ui that the cats was barred tir the lUtuto of limitation nc and thai court ia declduj Thli court ook the omo view 1ouKMioN ArFiiuui lieU Hyudiuau ly her guardianvi Mary Jane Htccc up ellant fcm tho Fourth dulrlctcourl uplnlon by Judge llurtuli she 11uIIII tuiU to recover Iho poiienlon of certain plcnllen on tbuground that they wero unlawfully wllhllIJ Rn1 for duotsgra rue court below found for the plaliitlfl I and 7t fUIt IIII Judge llartoh attlrmed lull drolilou I with Chief Justice 1no concurring AflIIOATIOM HIiU An ai > Hcitloa wa filed for a writ of hlea i corpus In limo oou 01 Henry Whettow recently tontociej to limn inontui liuirl > oumeiit ty JuJte Miner for ooutauipl Chu mailer will U laced tomorrow which limo tho writ wu nudo returnable WANT ONLY TWO COJIUI8SIOSK1U Tbo prtildeut of time Ogden bun allocution Itaniford Hmlln prnenled Ibofollowlnt wnlch wai mod That Ibo ends of juitlco will bo bout ubMrtwl by llmltlnK Iho number of nmmiliilononi I of the bupremo Court r RIIU eluting nt UJon to two who Imll have Ibo endurfomoiitof UMoclatlon Tlmt ibo lorfKolnir rwolmlnn bo lint before Ibo Niiprimo Court and that that body bo clliloiiod to carry It out BUMi UlllEll MA1T1IIS Qeorco W Young YO John 11 Dun nluu reiubmlMlouoidtrod Krank Monroe vi N It Hironr DI lion to dlml aPI eel lubmltlvd LOdd HaviS4a Hunk A fruit mil p I ny vi 10 J Ioourd colic 01 iitme Jlin I M ICenuelly tppelUui it Aaron JCoy uriauie Utoryo M Bjott I vi Krank Monroe apr tltsnl same Houthira 1aclflo railway company V Oiken et al kainv Wllllim llalley appellant vi BIJney rituveu < elali > uie Cisia son rjii HUAHINU The following ciinwern 10 for hAr rugby tho Hupnme court MtrrJay iHCUpyloR from June Ills to the UIII luclutlvi TOKSDAV JUM ant W L Collln vn JT Molntcib ap o Iollalll llwrLako A lover Valenrorki A Irrigation oumpauy AIl > ulhllll VI Uiiiim clly American Oak Leather company vi Standard lli Hidule l company defend nutand tho Union National Itauk mid A Ion to Dennett luterveuori and appillnutii Wi nNEeiuv JUNIJ 7nr Wm Carroll vi Adolben Itobertian pellaut Hopbla V Demon appellant vi Nichol Anderson el al THURSDAY Jute L Siir Thoi It UUslin appellant vj Bait Lake City et ul I J C Armitroiift et al 1 appellant vi laden City et al W B lfender ou vs 0 VUlKElni clot t uppeJJauti 1lllUAV JUNE Stir J IL Meyers aupellaut TI L n Adam 01 nl Motion to dIlOlI Mary Heeio ot al ojipdlaut VI Aloha ItiuM adiulnMnirix olc < MONDAY JUNK 1711 II M Hawliy vi Corey Bros i Co oplellant In the matter the cable of William U Ueor Moulton < olITouiey et al appellant Ta Oeorgo A KUll et al TUIMDAY JUNU LtTir O II 11t1l VI J > II Parson ap rollout 1eler Btubbc app lliut VI K II tnrnona Marih Ann Coombs appellant TIthe TI-the Halt Joke A Fort Uauglw lUllway company et al 1 WKUNEIIUAY JUNI Hnr H H Trrlll vi N It Uroeibeok at al appellacti John W loUthwalt plalntlll and appellant vi John r Lyuoll ct al 1 di fendanti and appellant > o vs L 1 Keleyetal Thomas It Jones TI William U UalllKber npiwllaub TUUIUOAY JUNB IfiTIt The United Blalei of America v > certain rtxil estate IJardo llouir n IOnlt 7J Titblne yurd Church Farm and coal laud Four coem KitiUAY Just lore I II Darger el al l vi Hi V Lo Hlcur ill ellant ItehcarlUK ItobertHlluiicJH vi lire Union fool no Hallway company appellant Ito litarlnt John W Bmlth va Itlo JranJe ntilern Itallnay ompany appellant MONUAY JUNK 10m Bridal Anonymo dre Mini tie LezliiKtouvi tuo Old Jordan Mining v Mllllin company appellant Oeorge W YOUIIK couteitaut Ta J II blotting canttiiee lloio Durfto mint J Durfce TI tho Union Iuclflo Ilillway tompany up Ilolloni TuuiiuY lilac WTir John Blake et al vi Cyrus Ittwun OlIO Hpllanti Oliver Mjeri vi Union racllio Kill way comiauy nppellant Hanh Wo diulitl TI tho Southern llrlllo Hallway company npiollaut Is W Couiihrau al appellauu vi II C HlKlow et al WEUNKIUAY JDNH 1 IHT I Jamo JI JtuoU appellant vi Carlin 11 lInk eta I John lo Hmltb tt al vi A F Hip perlyel al defendanli and iHr dray et al lutervecori and upKll aim Zloni Bavlniti llauk and Trutt company vj FjeJ J Leonard Col I Itctor 1m D Wlnti vi the Ills Grande Wettern Ilullway company appell nuts TIIUIUJUIY JUNI SSNI J H Voorbeiava Jamei A Fliher appellant American 1ublliblriK company i > pi < llant vi the C L Mayne com > all Joieph Haumgarten vi Frank Hod man appellant ritiiirjutii 2399 Frank Leak TI the Itlo Grande Weiteru Hallway Company appellant appell-ant aotOgllell Clay company TI W F liar vey appellant Bamiif I Dennett vi the Tlutlu Iron company appellant our IMWEO Wolf Jlarkietnl vs WII Culmor et al appellant William lleittlo vi Tloaiant Valley Coil ocmpany appellant 1arnroonali Field I A Canal comniny vrl J n WlllUin UdwarJi appullasl i J T Cheney vi W 1 OMeara appellant ap-pellant ZIoniBavlngallank A frost oom panv apjwllanl vi L U Hardy col loetor John Illazztnl by hliKuardUn olo et nl v < Mark II Illuztardetal appel rII Ilr U AllI r lust and four almllir I caiei Iaued for llIomnl CABKa CONTINUED W K Ilurrowi appellant TI John L 1rlce Dennis Danlher IM lbs Oraud Lodge AO U W ell Titian 011 ICnliilit I I appellant vi the Utiertt National bank et al and Kob ort Owen Intcrveuor coati IiisiiiesKD Bait Lake county and W I Lynn I treaturer vi L U Hardy collector |