| Show g m TIm THE MOBILE DECLARATION I J Countries t l like Peru and aud Ecuador and c cannot uncover unco their a vast t rec resources re ro re- re C c sources es Without the use uso of quantities of money which they themselves cs do not V I possess If It they aro are not to bo be allowed allowe 61 fJ to obtain tho the requisite capital from t t En England laud or France Fiance or German Germany upon r. r Ui tho best terms th thes thenn can enn make where i l are the they to get Jet it Surely not fr from m V th tho treasury of the tho United States Not Noti Noti i i even n Bryan would woul propose that v Front From American investors pro oro t then leJ upon most mode mode- modest t terms fixed by iy 0 the tho department Hard Hardly I. I I Our Out pee i pie have novel newer shown a disposition to r embark in in South American enterprises I cven when offered the tho extraordinary inary in J f du which hi h attracted foreigners ft Are they likely now to ha hazard ard their for for- fortunes Lunes for or pr profits tits not only prospective U bu t r restricted in far ofT off lands when bil bil- lions of tested securities at home borne omo aro are aroc fi c awaiting wai H absorption I Whence then Js is I the emancipation b by considerate I lenders lnders at nt easy caby rates to como I a. a la Is it emancipation Is it not enI ent en- en I It t l By what able right I ot what hat f upon fancied fancie theory can the tho w Un united it 00 Stat States s assume a suzerainty so 5 complete and so far rea reaching That fc ti is tho question which some flome South Amer Amer- lg i lean ican an or oj European 1 government is bound I. I to ra raise lH and g soon too J ct to a definite transaction What will be 1 tho answer r of the thc administration ion f g What can ean it be be Shall we Wc if pressed crl recede from tin tho Mobile declaration Or shall w wr fi tight hl if f need be in of t- t a d doctrine which is 4 obviously unton V JI able In cither ith r eaSe caso how would Bo livia or 61 E Ecuador or Peru profit from such interposition in in favor or of human hutnan M rights national nal integrity it anti and L a as R against material interests interest III Wo We c ho 10 th that t r j dent tent Wilf Wilson OD did not p perceIve tho lid end lidiD in iD ing of this extraordinary inar proposition ho launched its bp beginning Arid And h pro 1 can but hope bopo that icI r. hice I h to result in embarrassment if Jf not to tho country au an aud l t sell may not aoL George Har v v in in n the Iho TaY uan number of tho the North m rican |