| OCR Text |
Show i.'Ti:ni:.sriMi ciiuut xewv. W. II. Irvine Seeks a Dliurt 9 in Action bj II10 I'nlled satrs agslat tlio U. I'. Itallroad Co. Ulhrr hulls. W. II. Irvine, who waa recently tried at Llmolu, Nebraska, for the murder ot llaukir Moutgomerj, and acquitted after a protracted hearing, uu Baturday evening tilts 1 a suit for U Ivor 10 from his wife, In tho Third District Court. Tho complaint Is very brief. In It tho 1 ttltlonir (through Towers A. Iltlm, his nttorneys) ttatel that he and hit wlfu were married ou Juuui.11, 1683, Itls alleged that tho defendant com-mlttoJ com-mlttoJ adultery with Charles i:. Mont-goiuirj Mont-goiuirj ut Lincoln, Neb,, In USD, and In Chicago on ur about February 24, IS9J. Upon thoso grouu Is Mr. Irvlmi prajsforn dcortaof divorce; that his wife may la debarred from any ilalm or title to his properly, and asks nlso lor tho custody of his llltle daughter l'lossle, agej seven years. Mary Ann Mammon 1 also tiled an action for dlvorceagalntt hur husband, William Hammond, lu the Third District Dis-trict Court lateuu Btlurday afternoon, Thu I lalntltl alleges that the detend-ant detend-ant hat continually treated her lu a cruel aud Inhumsii manner, and 111 on a certain occasion threateuel tu kill berandutlacxed bur with a butcher knife. The complaint It llll.d with allegations al-legations of a similar character. In addition to a decree of Ulvorca the planum also dislris tho custody of even ruluor children and aits that tho defendant ba retrained from disposing of oroooiipylngtho property held tn common, pending a settlement uf the suit und division of the property. Quito recently Hammond was tried upon a charge of beating hit wife, lie was found guilty nud tlueJJS j whlon ho j aid. Johu Wall aud Ule II. l,t,rou brought rult la the Third District Court late ou BsturJuy afternoon against thu Margin M nlug mil Biielltug Company. The plalntllls nlieged that they sold terluln valuable mining report) In Alder Creek district, of Idaho, tj thu da feudanls, and that they wero 10 receive re-ceive n per 1 rnl uf the prooeeds of stock to be sold, which amounted to fS.OOO. They allege that the stock was told but that their portion wai not forthcoming, Hi nro they demand k judgment for H.OOJ with four yiare'lnlerett.amount. lug in all to 17,001). One more, Llkuwlso lata ou (Saturday (Satur-day ihu Unlti-i Htutiellllei an action against the Union I'ft.'lllo JUlUn) company In the Third dlstrlit cMlit, I raj lug that thu itcfuidaiitV intent on ceitiluyaliiable mal lands In tlunintlt county lu canceled. The plnlntlll alhget that the palent was Istunl through luadverleiicu aud mlstaku ou the part uf thu plalntltl), but with full ffifrdSfEfr' .sfl kuuwlrdgoof Ihedi'f.i laub-, that the lands w r not tu' I to nleclih under Iho laws nf thulnltnl Btatet, an I that tbeplilntlll In bound under said law tu confirm t'10 lands men tinned to tnlutl appro rmlnraand ep pllnaula nn to issue tin m patents therefor. Thn Ian Is were secured under an act of Congress approved June - ', 1971, entitled "All aot for tho relief of settlers oil railroad lands," tut It Is Alleged that the defendant waa nutkor-lieil nutkor-lieil to select lands not mineral lu th clr chaiacler. |
