OCR Text |
Show SUl'UIUIB COUItT. Three lhclslom llnultreit. Stlltnz of Civil Cans for tho l'risiut Ti rm. Tho Bupromo court of this Territory met this morning ut 11:10 o'clock. On thu bench were Chief Justice C. B. Zino, Judge John W, Illiikburii uud Jainn A. Miner. Tho minutes of Ilia last teuton ol the Hiiprema court wera riad by Clerk llncln'i nud slirned by the chief justice nnd atioclute Jiiitlcas. in.ci8io.Na, The cue of Charles Talntcr vs. Janus Chtpman it al., appeal from the Flint Dl.lrlct court, Involving tbo owuenhlp of land upjn tbo bordir of Utah lake, thu defendant claiming he hud a right lo follow tho laud to the water's edge, ai d that no ouu had a right to Intervo'iu between Ills premise and tho water'i edge. The decision, which was quite lungttiy, waa rendered by AuocUto Justice Miner; tho Judgment of tho court below wai lustaliieil with oosti. Harvey Hardy nnd Duller, appellants, appel-lants, vs. llambcrger and Morris, tho present selectmen of Bilt Lkecounlj. nil decision was rouderod by Arao-clato Arao-clato Justice lllackburn In favorof tho prcioat Incumbent, Chief Jusllcu Ztnunnd Assoclato Justice Macktuill coucurrlug. Ueorge Hverett vs. Oregon Hhort Lino nnd Utah Northern Iltllway Company. Tills decision was rendered by Unlet Justin Zvie. Thn ludgmonl of tho lower court wai alllrraed, Justices Jus-tices lllaokburn and Minor concurring. concur-ring. OAI.tJ.DAII. (; were set aa follows: The United HtUt vs. certain real estate Involving the Usrdo Home property; prop-erty; III J over for tho term. Also case Involving Tithing Houio properly; auiue order. l'eonlc, etc., vi. J, U. Bulllvnn; let for Wednesday. 1'eople, etc., Cisa Hltc; net for Thursday of next wro c. 1'eople, etc., vs. l'.nocll Davis, Ir m First dlstilct court; let for tomorrow. Thomas It. Hlglni vs. Bait Lake City it ul.; continued for thn term. lliomii Jennings etnl, vs. Bait Lake ltapld Transit cuuipany; continued for the turn, Win. (larland vs. Tho Hear I.ako t lllver Water Works & Irrigation com panj; set for March 14th. rwocatr. Charles lu Hannmuan vi. 1j. C. Knrrlck; ict tit thoillll Inst. M. I-. OjIIIii vi. J. r. Mcintosh; set for tomorrow. A. W. Werlr, v. Tho Western Union Telegraph ooupany; let for tbo lfilhlnst. Ullverll. Dudley vs. Ueorge I'acer etal.; lit for the 15th Ids:. Wm. Crawford vs. llaitey Ilooth, motion todlimlitappeal;ietlor March 14th. II. Ii. Mlerllng vs. 1). II, Parsons; let lor thu 10th, llllla llyndmin (by her guardian) vi Mary JaneBlone, tut lor mill, Ilyan Iteam Citlle company vi. J, U. Miirdocketnl; let for the rind. W, L. Ilurrow vi. Jnhu L. Tries; continued for tbo term. Lester T, Uoer vs. Jennings llroi. Investment compauy et al; lei for the Slit lust. J. C. Armitrong et al. vs. Ogdon; continued for the term. William llealtla vs. 1'leatant Valloy Coil com piny; set for I'riday. Hyiuau Harris vs. Itichard Chip-msu; Chip-msu; eel for tho lnd. Anna Mulks and Wolf Mark! vi. W. II. Culmer et al; set for March "Oth. Mlutie llurton, by W. C. l'avey fher guanllanud Iltti.l) vs. WnlJemar Van Coll, aduilnlitrator, etc., set for March 17, Thn National Ilink of the llipulillo vi. II. K. Hupgood, et ul., tit for Much 17. Wolf Marka et al. vs. W. H.Culmor, continue, 1 fur term. JotinUuli1ndirbcrlvs.Tu Crcicsnt Mlulug compauy; pu..u lor thu prnent. Joseph P. DeJwldge, county clerk, elc vs. (Ho. II. Mitsou, ut ul.; set for March 0. (leu. Kverllt vs. Oregon Bhort Line and Utah Northern Hallway cmupany; act for March -Ut (two cases). John Illaisard. by his guardian etc., etal. vs. Mark II. lllatxird nt al., (live cases) continued till June I). II, M. Huwloy vs. Coruy llrolhers, paised for the term. Morrison, Merrill & Co. et al. vs. the Carey Lombard uonitany; sit for 21st Inst. In the matter ol thoetatnof William Moiiltou, deceased;! let for March -Uh. Henry C. Haaratlck vs. MoylauU. K x; executor of estate of Harsh M. MoKlbben, deceaiod; let for March 27th. Franz Jungk and Ferdinand I'ablan vs. D. C. I tend: let for March 28. William l'erego va. Wm. H. Dodge it al.; nt for March 8. THIS AlTI.II.IOON. Tho first catu decided In thu Bupremeuourt thla afternoon was the n eal ca-u ot Hush J. Wuruer vs. tho lusuraiicooompany, Thu opinion was rendered by Assoilato Justlcu Mluur, aud thn judgment of the court leluw wai imlalued with costi. Kauu aud lllackburn concurring. Tnucasoof Iho Itephl Irrigation company vi. Jenklni appealed from Judge lllackburn'a court at l'rovo. l'he motion now U to dlinilii remlttl-luer. remlttl-luer. Uouniolfor appellant, 1'.. II. Crllih-low Crllih-low contended that Judgo lllacxourn sitting on the bench at tho lime tho decision as rendeied luadu thu latti r null and void, It belug n cisu iik)u which ho hud rendered u decision. Mr. Varluu, ou thu other side, claimed that the act ol Congnsi did not cover His ground claimed by the appellant , nnd further tho court reoirds do not shew that Justlcu lllackburn did par-tlclpato par-tlclpato In tho case. Appeal denied. Court ndlourned until tomorrow morning. |