Show CASE MOVES WIH RUSH Judge Wil Will Cut Cu Circumstantial Evidence From Questions NINE MEN ARE ACCEPTED ACCEPTED FOR CAUSE Peremptory Challenge May Excuse se Most of of- of Them However 1 1 ILOS I- I LOS ANGELES iov Nov 2 lu I In contrast con to yeste yesterdays yesterday's tedious proceedings proceedings proceed proceed- I ings today's session of the McNamara murder trial opened with a a rush Immediately Im Tm- mediately after tho the oJ opening of court Lorenzo Romans challenged yesterday by the theat at was as released by the court with Consent of both sides and with no t Reference at t alt all al to the ground for challenge which was wal a statutory provision a Ig any mental or physical disability This left lef nine mue P. P the box box boX fill fl ll accepted as to e c usand a three more ls John John I L. L E. E Miles Is and nd J. J J M. M r Hun were selected by bt lot ot to take th ir a s in the box Miles liles said he could ear ear well wel and was opposed to capi Ho lie was excused Chi Ch s excused because he ho could no ioa i 1 n in s verdict of guilty on lal ial evidence and the box was ras fi fl p ag in Counsel In Tangle Opposing counsel oun ei Sd them them- sel seive sels s In a i tle se Bordwell s ac action Uon ii in excusing J 1 JI Chambers and 0 O II ii 11 Have Hae neither believes In voting for capital i ase on e ev The Tle state stare argued that it h had e c g d Chambers info hut hit had bad ito TIO Hayes and Hayes Haves box a was 8 r r r-caU ea U We now a- a ak asIc k tha the bols- bols sued for JoCeph Jo- Jo Mph seph Scott cott of or coune the defense Th The request was refus reus I for the Attorney dc- dc cense was as refused refused per perthe to the regard beliefs on circumstantial d been previously Ula u ae not challenge on QI thi If you challenge V 5 A Attorney torey F Frederick Fredericks Just because bf we barc an ax W WP we dont don't have re to o swing awing It It Fr Fredericks Davis a asked Hayes Hayes' a name a be go pu put k ba-k in l the tho bov from o Cl names of are dra drawn t to t fill vacancies alc l lIn in th lh the jury jur So box 10 Jet th there re to await awalt Its Is turn tur This a wa refused Judg Judge herd Boid- well closed the Incident d bv by a announcing u A de that ho he would 0 not m e any more tal n as to to tH their r beliefs on circumstantial circum circum- I evidence Began Bega Day With Wit N Nine ne The nine time tal who had been ben passed for cause at the opening of to today's today's to- to days day's sinn of court were Ire Samuel Mendenhall Men Men- de hal Seaborn Manning Robert Bah Balti F. F 1 D 1 Gren George W W. Johnson and Frank Frae Frakes Lorenzo Romans was the only onry other In the box because yesterday afternoon two were excused after not yet drawn Into the box had ha been allowed to leave court until today and the t two o vacancies could not then be filled fled Peremptory challenges which may be he called caled for even before beCore the end of or the week are exercised alternately in m California Cali Cali- fornia foria the state leading oz When each side has used as many as It desires the work of filling th box will m be started over again but no no man once overlooked can ran t hereafter be bet challenged peremptorily ily il- I It It I Is possible therefore that the end of this week will show at least leat two or three jurors who are finally accepted A transparent glass glas screen three feet high was Wa erected today today bet between the jury jur box and the newspaper seats immediately immediate immediate- ly l' I adjoining The object It i was wa said Mid AS ss to prevent fragments of conversation from the newspaper from Crom leaching the ears of jurymen en The screen gave e the jury jul box the he appearance appearance of oC a a. cage 1 Romans Is Excused Talc Lorenz Lorena Romans was excused ex ex- when court convened at 1015 o'clock counsel for he defense deciding not to resist the eh challenge lenc of the state Under the stances stanc remarked Judge Bordwell I think you OU had ha better better bet bet- ter not serve erv erA Tha Thai accords accord with wih your views does It not Yes said nOmaD Romans as he le left the box OX with a broad grin 0 or his fa face e. e JoIst John Chambers I L. L K Ii 1 Miles Mies and J J. J M. M Huntley vern wern drawn from the venire to tofil fill fil the vacancies In In the jury box Miles was excused d because he did not bel believe eye In 11 capital pu nt and Tales Tales- TalEs TalEs- man J complained of oC poor hearing hear hear- ing The district attorney and counsel for the defense alternated In asking asking- asking Huntley questions iri hI II low voices to t st his hl hearing hering and he tie le all al as If I l he hh understood so fa It was cS decided that his lila hearing heating was sufficient nt Edward R. R Jeffrey Jefrey and O O. I If 11 Hayes Haes were substituted d for those excused 8 Hayes ayes ayeR said sald saide e e the death penalty only r where h d direct evidence was adduced u and he was wai g Later e it was de decided de- de rt to recall Hayes HaeB as It was thought b bv by the court court that that perhaps th the examination examina lion tion had not gone gon- far enough ough An argument ensued as to the t legality of returning Hayes to the box hox but the th court court ruled that he ml might ht be The de defense defense de- de de' de nse requested 1 tint Chambers also alfo be returned but hut the application lon was denied as a the thE court though his answers had Is dis- dis disqualified disqualified qualified him beyond question queston Hayes Haes was wal I Immediately examined by bv Clarence S. S Darrow chief counsel for tor the defense Hayes Against Unon Unions Hayes said his feelings and opinions had been against unions for some time From what Ive I've heard read and seen all the picketing In San Francisco Fran Frau cisco citco o lye ve formed my opinions about la Ia labor II bor unions I explained aF d dof of Hayes Hajes Ha las la's es a d that he lie le b believed the Times was blown up by unionists and that dynamite was wall II the agency used That hat would Influence and bias you ou to toward ard this defendant would It not notT asked Attorney Darrow Ator think Yes resI I so o. o |