| OCR Text |
Show BtMtssjr-s Keptr e rarnell. 1OXBOJf, Nov. 30. Motley has written the prea. In reply to Far-fjeU'asssanlfeato. Far-fjeU'asssanlfeato. He aays, positively, positive-ly, that be made no attempt to fetter ParneHi action with reference to the land MIL Both Gladstone and myself completely recognized that their relation with the Irish party were thoea of an Independent alliance, alli-ance, and not a fusion. "Parnell," he says, "imputes to me a remarkable remark-able proposal without an object, absorbing ab-sorbing tbe Irish party Into English politics by means of office. I made no proposal. It was natural that In a free, confidential dlscursion of the possible future I thsuld wish to make sure fjr Gladstone's Information Informa-tion that Parnell still held to his self-denvlng declaration of 1SS0. Hit aoswer was what I fully expected." ex-pected." Motley si a that ParneU's account of what passed on the same occasion on tbe autject or evicted tenants on the "Plan or Campaign" estate?, is Incorrect Though he (Morlcy). foresaw difllcultics In the way of legislation, he never said that he or auy of his colleagues had formed any conclusions agalnt legislation. He did aay that whether by direct or Indirect action, tho evicted tenants bUght tot to La allowed to suffer. He never hinted that It would be impostible frr an Irish Parliament to do anything In the matter. In conclusion, be says that on November 16th ho was Under the most distinct Impression that Parnell did not object to the suggestions thrown out at Hawardena year ago as to the subjects for provisional ex-a-ninavion, ir those suggestions were likely to make the scheme generally acceptable to Great Britain. Mrs. O'Shea is at Brighton with her four daughters and Parntll was with ber during the Parliamentary recess. He returned to Brighton after the trial of the divorce case. |
