Show VON fOR NE r hAL fAl FILED IN of Jury in I Will Contest AlI Alleged g d c r misconduct n of ot the tho jury jur 11 ilC rd tho the Henry IJ II Ke Newell cil OO 00 will cu contest in Third dis- dis IV Ourt Jurt t I several days 8 a ago o for foZ VillIam M. M st st. Bradley If if tl t tho and tl slees of or ord id d Stanford university heavy filed n a motion to set sel tho verdict and order a lI now non Thursday 1 HI lam H. H Newell Newel Jr r legitimate t f William l II n. Newell Sr Jl- Jl mate nate soil json n o of ot tho n mining man t L tober b ber r 30 won woJ his t in TJ Third rd ct rt court ourt over tho disposition wUI ant and antraN W raN awarded award half I DOO 00 c estate Tho The decision was wi as at after 11 a a. hectic court ut 46 ther charges named in tho moi mo- mo i ie cro irregularities in the Swings o of cC the court rind and nI Jury which h. h tho Uio defendants e were were lr pro pro- d' d a 1 fair 11 liero zira Q Was a as cause for fot accident or lse which under ordinary cIr clr- could not noE bo ho guaro guarded d i t. t 1 iero ero ro have hava been beim ne new discoveries erles l nal evidence c for the dc dc- auls which ants which could not have been and iro produced u ed at the time t t. t a al ll ie r. r were ex 0 damages tho the defendants appearing to been given tho the t C passion nn and prejudice evIdence l rc was insufficient that at tho the verdict was against I iero io Wrt errors in the inter- inter of tho law w which were cx- cx M f d' at nt tHo time o of or the trial by Defendants and that there tl were of misconduct nn the part 1 for the plaintiffs V I |