Show IS CASE Of L DEPUTIES on Suspension e Handed Down Later Lateri i on onn Jn n a co consolidated peWit pe- pe Wit writ of prohibition to toe toI I e power powel of the county dismissal or sua- sua sheriffs deputies the thel l court listened to ex- ex by opposing and then took Id ider ide r advisement ad th the county commission r rained ined or supported i ito in to suspend si six deputy e er indic ment for foro o or law violation will wille be e d decided for two as reported at the saie S Wednesday that it will rig ng for the five supreme l to o survey th the cas case BRIEFS m-Cs m and argument beurt be- be urt by attorneys for Patten and legal es es of the county were vere t administrative ioard o rd of county comma com com- i-ard i was r ma mao maI lo the defend- defend petition for Lor Pt prohibition by which en enand and G. G L. L f fifthe the he deputy sheriffs I federal 0 dry net hope J county commission- commission the sheriffs sheriff's settlement of the thun thein county commis- commis the th the power to hirce hire e e of the sher- sher averred the then n mission was r responsible ot the coun county y yUi Ui It was within to dis dispose of deputy n deemed deeme l LAIM for Sheriff Patten and anda a Declared the ins sheriffs sheriff's rg j unlawfully ordered without hout a a. hearing henring or arges ages arges of misconduct hem ments were con con- ourt announced it would l In ithe he county oy Vy an aterna- aterna issued last supreme court from suspension of the dep- dep until tn the supreme court i ts decision sheriffs who were wereth ere th federal grana grane Jury to violate ta the Qi tIon law were G G. L. L L Claude Hc is Smith is Smith Sutton John 1 i I Bert Smith Their riding ng In fed federal ral court |