Show Exchange Permit for Osteopaths Denied There is no provision authorizIng authorizing ing lag you ou to grant a certificate to osteopaths by reciprocity to practise practise tise tiso in Utah This Is the opinion of Attorney General Harvey II H Cluff gIven ghen to Jam James s T Hammond director of ot registration in reply to a letter In which the director asked somo some questions relative to the law Jaw regarding osteopathy One question follows Whether or not an osteopath who has been li licensed II- II censed ceased in another state and desires to come coma to this state is entitled to license by reciprocity and what I kind of or a license will i ke o issued I The attorney general cites the law and says S that if It the tho osteopath osteopath path de- de desiring to practise as a n phy ph and surgeon were vero J permitted to come como In by reciprocity under tho provisions of the 1921 laws he would bo be getting privileges and a 1 certificate under more favorable conditions and In itt a A. way that the I osteopath desiring to practise as a physician only without recourse to to operative surgery has no right to and arid also under more favorable fE condition condition con con- than one desiring to take tho the examination and ami secure a n. certificate cot cot- I In this thin state slate There Thero i Is an I opportunity lot for discrimination or oran oran oran I an apparent discrimination tui Il to to I give rico to the Constitutionally of oft I the act and wherever such question question ques ques- tion may arise it is m my understanding understanding under under- standing that the universal rulo rule of ot construction i in iA to construe the statute if It possible In a way va that It will harmonize with the There l is no provision au authorizing an- an nU 1 you ou to grant a eel certificate certificate cate cale to osteopaths bj by reciprocity |