Show question ot LONDON june 34 special the between the advocates and opponents of vaccination which has continued at ever bance the of legislation maltina mal tiny tion and providing penal aea for non with the law has recently broken oat with renewed vigor the causa of tho renewed inter eat in the suba c bobinc the by the royal of i report setting forth their cladma in support of vaccination the ot tha aas aa s that vaccination the liability to pox second that it mitigates iha fo verity of tho disease and thial that it greatly reduces the rick of a fetal result at though thieo claims are not enesp inai 8 were they are bv an adrai of which it ia have b c bugged jugged out of all to truth c s s saverna parr an ieta chiy ayi issued apparently that the figurea adduced by the coku mission on their eide of the proposition in broye quite tap and adny prominent aro quoted all admit the great risk of diee aee venereal ven areal dicasa di aasa trough the varua aed in the vaccination Nn merona cases are cited in which healthful children have been made the victims of he moat and other are mentioned of parents to terms of rather ihan allow their children to submit to the possible dabera of vaccination vaccina tiou dangers which are admired even by the royal commissi onto be in the ag cremate not inconsiderable the present the suba ct promie ea to be more than any that has preceded although it ia somewhat doubtful whether tho on position will result in a c ange from existing conditions |