Show 0 o edys auw A sensation in the hague case WHY HE CASH andrus jensan saya two jurors were for sale aines not when alma hague was tried in provo jagt fall theio was a rumor leaded tl e j prosecution that be bad approached jurors it appears now that judge judd is attempting attempt inz to prove as much in the trial now on at salt lahe yeater the prost cution pui on the stand andins jeneau of nephi judge asbed dilyou Did you have a with mr ahw cf the trial at provo last november ith reference refe renie tu loading him 50 judge ang objected to the qu aaion aa imn aderial at erial incompetent anil ft hilly outside the issues presented by the ii junga KIOK what ia he object of ahsee jaded chii is for the purpose of chowne that at the former trial mr bauo to borrow 50 for the of bribing jurors jude king we object to the stale ment ot counsel such a statement is outrageous outrage oua and counsel should knew bolter than to make it bogoro ahr jury judge howat 1 resent the impute tion of in thia matter I 1 mav be ignorant of the law but conned asked for a statement as to the purpose of this testimony and I 1 gave it to him judge kin I 1 did not eay you wee dishonest I 1 simply said that it ans out that the jury ehi uld hear such a statement aa the one you juat made the bourt here interposed ruling that the testimony would be admitted but atiat it would be limited to th t part which concerned the ineram note as the was only on trial on the one indictment at the time judge king took an exception to the ruling and the was directed dir ti answer the question witness yea I 1 had a conversation with mr hague in ha spoke to me about betting 50 on a business deal he baid he needed the money very much that be waa in court and a dollar to help with I 1 told him that 1 did not have the mony but would try to get it for him judge howat did you eee him again and have another conversation with him about what he wanted the money for witness dont re mamber about it it is a long time ago I 1 believe eu was eaid to the effect that be had learned through some of bis friends that there were two of the jurors who would hana the jury for 25 each and that he could not afford to let such an opportunity pass on cross examination the witness jensen stated that be did not give the defendant acy money and abot be really did not remember exactly what passed between them on this occasion judge hen dd mr hague tell yon the names of these jurors witness yes A somewhat lengthy consultation was held between counsel for the defense and a decision being arrived at judge henderson continued what are the names I 1 cant ay I 1 remember the court remarked that it waa fortunate that the witness was Bof ferine from a lapac of memory as the evidence wan not competent judge henderson I 1 wish to say in explanation that I 1 dont think myself that it if only to test the credibility of the witness the testimony as to the signature on the notes is the same dreary tale as told at the trial at provo |