Show vr w the laud belongs to fuei SHEEP CASE olson and justeson brina damage suit against loveless and others after he atto in the johnson vs clinger land casa had addressed the jury and the judge had delivered hia the jury retired in charge f a balin A jury was impanel led n tho case ei andrew and peter justeson Juste eon vs H S loveless justice W seeley and michael molan the plaintiffs claim to have been dispossessed of 1949 head of sheep and camp outfits valued at last march and bueaford Buea for this amount the defens 8 is that the property levied upon and taken away was the property of ole oleen by mr nolan under a judgment against oly olson H S loveless was sheriff and justice W freeley deputy sheriff of emery county where the property was taken diug aud johnsoa are counsel for tha and geo sutherland for the andrew olson one of the plaintiffs to living in spring city he was iu the shep and peter justeson Just eaon hadaa ken a herd of sheep from soren nielsen 4 yeara ago last august to herd on shares there were other adeep in the herd had seen the herd last in TTo vember 1890 it wat then in procession of hia her durs tome of the adeep that were taken were the original adeep received fron neilson and others were their cambs iambs tha step were worth about 4 a head when they were taken away dan jensen and nephi allred who were in charge of the sheep had herded fr aim about a year faey reported the sheep were taken away justeson Just eaon and I 1 were partners no one else bad any right to the herd of sheep croaa examined my brother ole and I 1 were in partnership till the fall bad a partnership with my brother and one with Juste gonin dit ferent herds of allred a herder told me that ole had comi and got from my ard in 1889 I 1 got the adeep back ola had a herd of dont know how large it wa I 1 gal head of sheep ola in 1 took charge of olea cheep during i the shearing season iu 1890 did nut deliver them back te him I 1 abold the and delivered some sheep to lauritz larsen for him when I 1 bot the sheep from my Dro lher and I 1 bad about sheep ole told na afterward that he had taken some sheep from molan 10 herd saw loveless at price after the sheep were taken away started te take oct a writ of replevin for the abcejo after thoy were attached and when I 1 found they were in bad condition I 1 did not serve the writ ka direct acted ander the adaise of my attorney in not serving the writ had no interest in tha herd 1 looked after for ole except to them far him the 63 head I 1 bot from him waa ajr he was owing me the jury in the case of johnsen vs clinker came in and presented a verdict for the defendant court adjourned till 10 thursday ao inina THURSDAY MOt NINO court met at 10 peter justeson Juste soo was called in the 01 son ya loveleda Lov elesa sheep case he toti fawd to the partnership existing between andrew olson and himself in the boren nielson sheep he described thu brands on tatt sheep and the manner of conducting the herd A contract between and Justee and soren nielson was introduced and admitted nephi allred testified to herding sheep for olson and justason Justa soa and de cribar the sheep habold about the defendant taking the sheep aud camp outfit on the execution of ola and identified a paper given him by mr seeley shortly after ih sheep ware taken away court adjourned till 2 |