OCR Text |
Show OXFORD RULING IS WIDELY CRITICISED LONDON, Nov. 10 A Rlioden scholar, writing to tho Dally Mall, proteetn against the Oxford rcrolutlono as bring alined solely against Rhodes men. and contends that tho first resolution, dls-nuallfylnfr dls-nuallfylnfr a ntudenl from competing In the freahmea'8 oporta, should have provldod an age os did the .locond resolution, which placed the limit at U years In tho Oxford university athletic ath-letic club sports. The Mall editorially supports this protest. It declares thla It Is neither fair nor reasonable to exclude a competitor meroly because ho ha t-slded t-slded In some other university, and accuses Oxford Ox-ford of guarding her own English-horn atudonts against over-sea invader, while acoepllnc tho Invaders' In-vaders' help against Cambridge university According to the Sportsman, the rosoluUona hAve caused considerable adverse crlltclsm In Oxford, Ox-ford, where It la recoenlred that they aro especially espe-cially loveled at tho American and Canadian scholars. Inasmuch an other colonial acbolam do not com from xrnlvernltJea. aa do the Americana Amer-icana and Canadians. Tho question Is asked aa lo who raUod tho storm and the belief Is expressed ex-pressed that it did not arlso Inside the university, uni-versity, where H Is rocoRnlxod that, owing; to the necessity of becoming acclimated, the Rhodea rr.a are not at such a jrrmt advaataa;a as to mo people suppose. |