OCR Text |
Show !! pw Entered Lmg Water Case .,. ,he parties to tho dls-7. dls-7. the water of the Plcns- h ! ,tcm was In tllsputo np-, np-, E court at I'rovo mid nettled '.' Ktlon at lo1"1 court C0Bt i. Wm case of Murk Dezzunt ' 'pleasant Grove City, Hint at tlrcatened to cost thousands PL, ,Bd to almost disrupt tho E, arc felicitating each oth- I Ke happy el,dln& of ,ho dl8 everybody seems to bo "well From the best Information Btltarpcars tlrat the city got K wis entitled to nnd n sulll-1 sulll-1 totitr for all domestic pur- i B, Cjge was cotnmciiccd thin ' Hscilradtlsed the course tliut Kf tjken and subsequent rc- PWVC the wisdom of the Kjnunyaro Interested In the Etoent that wo reproduce In decree as It Is now on the cord: H Decree. use camo on for trial the of April, 1914, nt I'rovo, ' Hre Hon. A. II. Morgan, Judge, .tlthout a Jury; S. 11. Thur-ilre, Thur-ilre, appearing as attorney -hlntlffa, and Harvey ClufT, u attorney for the defence defen-ce reapectlve parties by their rner having stipulated In rt tbat findings of fact mid lot law be waived, and the decree entered, It Is there-'red, there-'red, adjudged nnd .decreed defendant, Plnsiiut Drove he owner of 1.35 cubic feet p(r second nf the waters of eta, In Utah County, Utah, In the complaint, nnd its !o la hereby quieted nnd 'ftr said drfcndiint, Pleasant Hr, It not the owner of nny tlty of water whatever He Pleasant Grovo Irrigation Hia; manner of form, except o manage, control and dlB- ' tame among the owners ihtrecf nnd the ownership and three-quarter ncres of clt; cemetery nnd one ncrn for city hull, nsldo from the 1 feet for waterworks, e plaintiffs and other per-h per-h they represent arc tho ' "ie remainder of the wnt-Hld wnt-Hld Batlle Creek and their So la hereby quloted nnd af- ,' a(erH or said llnttlc 'V be divided between tho B'rcto In the proportions W at tho plnce whnro It is W near the mouth of tho Mid creek and tho portion 4 Plaintiffs herein shall he IT means of a water tight JBloii or diminution to the of the present plpo lino toe same, excepting tho .'being diverted and usd t the weir defendant shall, ,,t uH 0vn construct, nnd perpetually " good repair, suitnble and , fuming devices at the miloii of said water and l Pictunlly maintain n uOelnit water tight ppt,. Mi .intor ''crcby iixvard- Plaintiffs without loss or 'roni the point of division ' wd of the pipeline as it '" event a dispute arises or not said pipeline Ih ik 8amo HlliH -lo re- !iwa,tcr commissioner iBiih "td1fir""l If In his '.d pipeline b defectlvi ,,? ,y, 'luctliiK nil of ,1 Mb In doubt and Ri n,e,,CPm,llu t,,C ,ot- nur m ,8fnc""'' without n lh, I "'? 'luamtlty of water it J? P,H of ! I'll"'- M? ' b" "' duty of the "Hf t.nllwn (,xlenso upon m ... commissioner to bolh n(r.,0r cnMW ll to be Bthe "' Point of dlvls ftt?1 U,,,Prm 'K t,M' ,r commissioner capable filing the qimmih th ""l'ol"t'd from llinr "irl.Li?"rt (a,ul 'or 'ha' BE iV?n R lioroliy lo ,lZtai"l determine tin Vhfn ".c;h r Pnrr ;'Hn J TlnPr ,ll(,re Is a dls . ' tlty HowIhk t-BnS t-BnS ,""P' rrfuses In or 'B'l I, Hi "' "XP,," thereof B Its J, ' ''" V whleh miiH B CO,m ' "f tllp "'t". Bt IT u rp"'' i" tii '!, '"VHl(m nf !'l" iBnni or ,V,,H""py '" ,,,m', 'B t ImoK ,""8 "P(,'vo. and lum.l,1,;lH,Ul'K', lo '' ''C . !" lnHPrv" '" '" "mi ii i,,r,,H"i,' or iiie lH wiwbbop is duly Bcoo,,iot n8 ncll0II 8llBll be eiiunlly ilMdeil lietween the iiMr-tles iiMr-tles plaintiff and derendanl, ami il; j he taxed aeeoidlngly. J ,. , v A- Hl MOUUAN, Judge. orriWr' l',n"' thl9 -9lh ,,,,J' |