Show JUDOS 9 HE t I 1 we are of tho the opinion that the proceedings c ce ted IM ot of the judo of 0 the kirbt dis di the case of cyrus ra R youn young applicant lot citizenship as published in ia ano another column will bo be reab rea with dome surprise by intelligent and fair people no such person can peruse those questions and answer ans and fevold tho conclusion that the die applicant 14 t was was on an honest man with a sincere ezard I 1 a v for orie tha institutions X ot of his country and ono one wh who 0 was wag irl in ill all ic breason aon to uphold them 1110 HB e exhibited atie we rial of chat good citizens aie mado made on tin other hind itis dalpa palpa palpable ble from the na t re oi of judge in terro f 1 atiq tiona nil that he went about tits his inquiry into ln uie the qualifications of the applicant I 1 with tile determination to refuse hi his s application the petty method of extorting damaging 0 to o the applicant was worthy is a pettifogger rather thon than a judge i we iva command cm mend to judge hendersons reading the question sand and answers which are aia given verbatim in ili tills this issue what can he think 0 f himself when hernds that he has usurped tho lie place 0 a cross crosa examiner when to induce mr young to contradict cont himself lit meiK lie he charges him with expressions which tha thi report shows Mr Young dad not use UBO II if it la is thus thua that the dignity of the ilia court isto be sustained if t liy by auch methods aliens with tile the ambition abe of becoming c citizens cit leng sire are to be taught tile the majesty and liberality ol of american judicial procedure itis it is not likely that any decent foreigner will find ill alsola Oon smiting with is a desire to Weco become ifie a citizen of una till a tt that thai makes the abuse V if belittling of the nation V by insignificant and persona perona clothed with authority it fl matter matte of ach ease not the tha least pitiful exhibition lit in this connection is ia tle inquiries d made t by tho the court of assistant district attorney hiles what do you say its as district attorney about this mans aeppli cation and tha ilia answer was van it mcbye oms to me very clear that lie ha cannot take tile the oath to obey all the laws of the united states while lie he is continually preaching aint them and advising othe outliers rs to io vitiate violate nt least some borne ot them tin tile district attorney went out ot of his hia I 1 jicy lp etc y to etalea a falsehood about the ap p annj lind and tho tha fact that the court did not reprove tho the untruth certainly ceita adds adda nothing to his character its as a maa or a judge the applicant stated that lie did not preach Poly polygamy zamy at all lie was never ne ver asked it he preached against the laws law a of ilia guaitia states he ha WAS interrogated only as to whether he ha would obey thi liw law respecting g polygamy iolj baray ilia his answer was yes in the face of this I 1 L G I 1 f i ajr rhile a aa faas cr erts that 4 the applicant cannot take the oath because he be ii ia coll coir I 1 preaching against the lassof law so the united states and advising others to violate at least some of them coin pare the falsehoods of mr milli with willi the alt and candid responses of mr younst young and what opinion can just men have of a judge that refuses the apall I 1 lf ol of the 66 latter presumably on the I 1 recommendation of tho former these aro the methods methodi that not only make courts contemptible but bring the tha governments ern ments majesty into disrespect I 1 tile tho whole prece proceeding eding shows rank bias a I 1 aed disposition to refuse citizenship to a Alor nion the very tery os as fier bertion tion that the court be satisfied that the applicant nm nas attached to t alit 10 principles of this country is i an am i aaion that he doubted tile intentions ol 01 I 1 mr young because ho was a mormon ills character was goad and could so BO f havo been proven and tho the fact act that he be had bild made appl ration for citizenship was ready to tike in an oath that thathy it 0 jo aouila uila in reaps I 1 to rd the bolint G I 1 Q t viam m gg s il a e H bieve L x g 4 under W ay iy vilh 4 candid seat mst ju judge id j would have haa been taken as I 1 good evidence that he be was attached to lilac the country anil and its principles td t besides pe aides tie the unusual andun hillure b t u r e of bf the interrogatories tile the deductions ot of the court being based upon what I 1 i Mrry oune did not say bar and aila upon the 0 j 4 44 flaud flAU 1 1 or blundering falsehoods of attorney hiles speak very little for far the 71 sincerity linc erity of the judge tilt put setting betting aside the question of mr youngs qualifications to take the prescribed oath wo we should ha be plea sed to 1 I 1 ahearn 1 learn how lils hir honer can reconcile ir I 1 I 1 using one of lis hia favorite phrases tile the premises upon which lie he says lie might I 1 a persuaded to grant the applicant his hi papers ile he says lays to mr young in sub i jl if you were risking for citizen chip in order to perfect a title to a piece ol of lani t more liberality ought to lye bo ex et excised in your case in other words norda 1 1 I I 1 hereby give notice gotico to au all 11 morison applicants cants for citizenship that being abor mons luona they are it they want is a C of government und their aepli I 1 I 1 cattia ilia good no mormon need apply MO instant that his hi honor intends to 4 i award a premium on treason ilia dr di 4 ilein 14 mma Dak was in the peculiar temper of his lii coni clence it would and did permit L I 1 him bilm to deprive an honest well lin mean ing of 0 the right to vote because of lla religions reli giona giolli belief but it would riot not consent to de depriving pr iving is mm man ot of hl tits land on such ouch jl A pretext so udder the of a doubt cis as to mr youngs young a mo motives tives in making liking for citizenship ha he full fell and got into thome alles of 0 0 mighty bil bad piece ot of logic |