Show THE EXAMINERS REPORT judge marshals charges adjer with dereliction of duly on monday afternoon in the supreme court judge saoko in behalf of the receiver and his attorneys he pointed out that the charges made in the trustees petition insinuated bad faith but the counsel for the court admitted that there was no bad faith in any of the transactions ha argued that the report of examiner hardness covered the whole ground was in strict harmony with the evidence and should be adopted by the court as a completa vindication of the accused judge marshall closed the arguments he claimed that the receiver had been derelict in not gathering in moro of the personal property of the church than ho had done there was also some real estate to which the same assertion was applicable judge henderson do you think the final decree estoes the government from pursuing property hereafter discovered judge marshall yes sir as to all property not specifically mentioned in the decree there was some farther colloquy on this point and judge henderson asaad suppose tho government is es topped as to all other property and it is lost who do you charge that loss i to judge marshall I 1 charge the receiver with being negligent in not informing the court of this outside property so that it could be warned not to become a party to the final decree without full on the subject we say we have evidence to show bad faith on the part of the receiver in not detailing accurately his services as receiver when the question of his compensation was under consideration the court took the matter under advisement |