Show STATE NEVS COURT AT CASTLE DALE An Im1Ql thC Water Case Is Heard I and Decided TRIBUNE SPECIAL l Castle Dale Fob laThe winter term of the District court opened huro thin week with Judah Jacob Johnson on the bench Thorn was not n criminal case on 1 the calendar cal-endar und but a small civil lIft The grand Jury Is now In Bcsslon It Is centrally understood that they will Investigate Inves-tigate the alleged note robbing case ofF A of-F Smith vs Robert W Mill of Ijiwrrmp This matter came up before HIP Im1 l trrn of court and the JJlslrlct Attorney ills uilescd the caso because of a defect in tho vjimplulnt Al tho preliminary hearing Unit followed Mr Jlills tcuond nrrcM Jis5tJco Anderson at Custlo Dalo ills charged the defendant Smith charges Hill with iMintrhhig a < 50 note from his Smiths hands und then claiming to have paid It Hill on the contrary con-trary assorts that ht paid Smith the money all In sold I The Kraml jury will probably pry Into till matter of C P Aiulcruon John Peterson Peter-son and Sam Iaisoii School Trustees of Castle Dale against whom n civil suit Is now pendlnir fur an accounting of school funds and In relation to the mailers connected con-nected with thiIi offHla diillrs The Jury may also Invostlgalo the death of Robert Nollsen of Onm vllJo who died on the nth of January presumably from un overindulgence in alcoholic stimulants The case ot Peter I Peterson and Emma Peterson vn the Rio Grande nnlluay company com-pany was continued till next term of court II R Smith vs Robert AY 71111 suit to recover note also continued J w Socly vs C P Anderson John Peterson ami Sum Larson motion for new trial continued 1111 next term Lorenzo Snow vs Sarah I B Young stilt to inlet title matter Bellied Don C Soely I vs Huntington Tamil and Agricultural aHaoeliUlrm a corporation An action brought by complainant to recover re-cover damages growing out of the sale oc certain shares of stock bv said company because nf defendants failure to pay assessments as-sessments on the construction of a reservoir reser-voir Complainant contested the right of the company to assess him for any cost of such reservoir because the articles of Incorporation of said company were silent In the matter of a reservoir uml that tho complainant was not benellted by such reservoir The articles however give the company power to control and regulate the How of water and the l court held that such was the purpose of the reservoir and therefore the company had the right to assess complainant The cage t of Cox S Snow of Orangcvllle vS George Peacock of TMant Is now being tried It Is a suit tQ recover TG7 on a store account Good were obtained by Peacocks Pea-cocks sheep herders and chargou to Peacock Pea-cock Tho latter claims he never stood good for tho herders who obtained these iroods and the store people assert that ho did |