| Show i I Ilt I V I + 1 GRAY AGAINST WOOLF t Ii I + I I r 1 William H Gray Wants Judgment Judg-ment Set Aside r I I Iii a 1 i I + I 1 I y CASE RUNNING TEN YEARS li I + h r Alleged Attorneys Acted Without i With-out Authority I I I I r I m Plaintiff Now Claims That Ho Was t i j Never Advised of Actions and Decisions Against Him i 1 I William II Gray filed suit In the District Dis-trict court yesterday through his attorney p j j attor-ney Edward McGurrln to have a Judgment t 1 Judg-ment rendered against him somo years i ago set aside and to have Isanc Woolf m restrained from attempting lo enforce the 1 P i Judgment Tho complaint iris forth that i I August P I IStlT action wag brought against k I Gray on a promissory J note for S0 dated l b p 1 I August 22 1S3 tp vita for eiplvt I months and for 100 attorneys feeJutunry 13 r 1 t ISS9 the complaint allots judgment was I rendered against Gray In the DIstilct 4 I court for F 137 Under this Judgment no j I process of summons vas served up to r I May 15 lII X I i The plaintiff alleges further that a demurrer t de-murrer was entered Ansrust 20 1S37 1 by David B Tewksbiiny Gray It Is alleged r t was never informed of this action up to I ti the time he decided to illo thli suit flay 15 1503 Jt Is atlll further alleged that t r on February 25 ISO an answer was tiled j by S P Armstrong claiming to be an attorney for Gray limn plaintiff now R claims that he never authorized this and that ho has no acquaintance whatever t I with Armstrong I 1 sr In view of all that Is I set forth here I I Gray prays that the default of Judgment y be set aside that nil tho proceedings In i t I the caso ho cancelled and that an injunction Injunc-tion bo granted to restrain Woolf from I 1 i enforcing or trying to enforce the Judg I ment r I I t |
