Show ilT1RSIMARTINS i ANSWER I I I 11 I I i LRepIy I to Her Husbands Divorce II Di-vorce Complaint I i I k Ii ALLEGES GREAT CRUELTY F 11 Charges That Her Husband Struck and Beat Her nnd Called Her Vile i I UNTaiues Martin Wanted Her Arrested jjj Ar-rested on Adultery Charge When He Head the Answer but His Request I Re-quest IVas Refused by County Attorney I I I I I ij torney Summit County Case i r J I ilndsen Released I t i I Replete with racy allegations Is i the answer and cross complaint filed bj Mrs Francis R Martin to the com Jplalnc in the divorce proceedings re contly instituted against her by her husband Fred Martin Martin alleged iplUshand I leged In his complaint that while he I li was absent from the city during about I nine months of the past year his wifo associated with lewd and vicious characters char-acters and frequently broke her marI mar-I rlago vows in addition to deserting their children and having them placed in an orphan asylum The wife now denies these allegations and charges I I hner husband with cruelly = and failure r i to support At TellurIde Colo in 1S20 i i Ehe says Martin struck and kicked fJ h her and thatlie frequently = called her the vilest of names in the presence of I I their children Mrs Martin asks forGO for-GO per month as temporary alimony for the support of herself and dhlldrcn I pending hearing of the case with 575 as an attorneys fee and 25 for r II imlt money She also aslcs for custody = I L of the children and for permanent alimony I Ii t ali-mony I 1 When Martin was given an opportunity = 1 oppor-tunity to peruse his wifes answer and 1 crosscomplaint h6 went immediately Ito the County Attorneys office and attempted I at-tempted to institute criminal proceedings proceed-ings against her on the charge of I adultery When the County Attorney learned however that there was a divorce suit I 1 r pending he emphatically declined to allow a criminal action to be instituted insti-tuted 1 A Summit county divorce case in t Tvhich Patrick Lynch is plaintiff and L i Margaret Lynch defendant occupied I 1 Judge Stewarts attention for someTime I some-Time yesterday The hearing was upon an order to the plaintiff to show cause why he should not pay his wife temporary 4 tem-porary alimony and attorneys fees I pending1 a final adjudication Lynch I was unable to show sufficient cause and was ordered to pay his wife 515 I per month temporary alimony and S100 as attorneys fees Lynch alleges that l ails wife deserted him In May 1830 jMrs Lynch denies every allegation made against her and says that in J May 18S9 her husband had her committed com-mitted to the Insane asylum at Provo 1 as an indigent She also says that when she started for Provo she had just one dollar which was tied up in J a handkerchief and that her husband I q took it from her She was released from the asylum in May 1S30 since which time she says her husband has failed to support her It also appears that Mrs Lynch lied an action for 1 separate maintenance against her husband I hus-band at Coalville some months ago d and that he paid her 300 to dismiss it and waive any claims which she might t have against him because of the suit Immediately after the dismissal she ays he tiled the present action Lynch Is a miner and has been employed continuously I tinuously l = at the Ontario mine for more t than twenty years Mrs Lynch says L he Is worth SOOO |