Show H OLD CASE PASSED ON One in Which a Utahn Is Interested Inter-ested Decided by U S Circuit Court of Appeals St Paul l Aug 2C Judge Sanborn of tie United States Circuit Court of Appeals Ap-peals In deciding the case of Aaron Keyjer vs John V Lowell brought on an appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado held that the Colorado statute o limitation Is I void and in violation of the Constitution I of the United Slates I The case dates back to JSS5 when the plaintiff i recovered Judgment agaiiiHt the defendant III tit Utah courts In I 1001 action upon the judGment given in I Jt > K5 was heyun and Judgment rendered In favor of the plaintliT for SliorJ Whuii the judgment was obtained the cause of acllon was barred by cue Colorado statute i limitation Judge 1 Sanhornu doclwlon reverses the decision of the lower court The records 0 LImO District court show that Aaron Kcyser recovered a Judgment Judg-ment against John W Lowell and C W higgins I February f ISSo in the United States Territorial con rt for Iho sum o L32I I and 1730 costs that ana an-a was made to revive the tmIl Ildc Ivc judgment judg-ment in January 1901 which vms suo ceflpful fo far aa Lowell was concerned Judgment being rcndfrecl against him Match 1 I 1001 for 905261 which wns lie t amount of the original recovery Including In-cluding Interest at JS per cent per annum an-num numI appears upon tho face of the papers that the defendant Lowell was a nonresident non-resident of the Stale and had been since 1SS although lie Sheriffs return shows that he wits personally served with process In the case tiled In January Jan-uary 1 0t The suit was dismissed as to IIIgKlnn Rawlinn Thurman Turd and Uodgo wood appeared as attorneys for Kv net Dy nnd Street CtH higgins andS and-S M I Bre < ve for Lowell |