Show d IH B 1 i I I i I = 11111 It 11 J BEFORE DIEHLS BAit J I 1 I I I I If I IJ I 1 I I 1r j II A temporary affection of the eyes I I i I I I 1 i caused Vf H Adams to mistake tho side r I I f ti walk on Franklin avenue for his downy 1 I J i I couch In tho Salvation Army lodging I c F I j i f house Acting under this misapprehension I i ti I TI misapprehen-sion of tho facts he carefully pillowed his W 1 i j t II head on the ouib and pulled several layers i I I r I hi I lay-ers of atmosphere over him An officer I B I I came along and conveyed the sleeper to I t f fJ q I 1 1 the drimkhousc Yesterday Adams was In I r I I court charged with drunkenness In re Ui1 sncrEO to the usual question Aro you I itl Il I I j guilty or not guilty he said = l hr went down to the Salvation Army and I j k L I I I gal a room and got tIred out of there k r I i Vcro you drunk interrupted the V it I I ill 1 I d 1 I court I wan not t II I IIIJ < II I Officer Soager testified that the defendant t I I 1 defend-ant WUH enjoying natuns sweet restorer C r I I on the pavement when tho policemen got rj t i t c I him The Judge thought that S3 or three I IN I 1II lays would bo about right and Adams ft I II I I I I l tpoJc tho three days II il f I H Is now the sad lot of our poet to speak i III f I Of three men who got full the first day of S I I III J the week 41 I II I lid Swenson Fred Wilson John Nleleon P I j the three f 111 II I IJ j I Who chose the wrong day to Indulge In a 1 I f I 1 spree 11 Ii 1i i Admitted their guilt and for live days will I 1I 4 I I beAt i I < i IIr j J 1 be-At work on the chain i sang A in lieu of a V 1 1 I 1 li t Sunday must have been a great day for t I t j i John DOP idglng i from the complaints I Ji i i filed In Police court Two men wero up charged with selling him liquor John I I 1 I Martin ono of the alleged Sunday liquorS I I S rj t I j 1t i sellers took until Wednesday to plead I flill i Joe Stephens thq < other defendant Is a II I I bartender at the G andG 1 saloon t i I jllt II r 4 1 I Officers Bush and Simpson testified that i III I they went Into the pIncH Sunday afternoon fj I and found four men lined up In front of I 4 III J F h l the bur two with glasses of beer in front j t j I of them The officers knew It was beer I I f I because it looked like beer folt like boor 14 1 t 1 Bmcllcd like bucr and tasted like beer I I I They neglected to say whether or not It iL I i t t I sounded like beer but thC presumption 1 j 1 I 1 was that It did Ig I I 1 1 Mr Stephens swore that the only men II a t who were drinking In the place were the i II i i porter the day bartender and himself i Ji I G F Boyd tho day bartender was rather I I t l I rath-er touchy on the subject of arrests IIi i I 2 Were you ever arrested before asked 0 1 the City Attorney I1 W ij I I I 1 Yea several I times but not for selling I II t llauorWhat iI4 III I 1 What were you arrested for I 1 refuse refuscto answer It Is none of your tjr 1 i t I business Is ItV JI It evidently was not for the attorney I Ii I I failed to press the question III tl Boyd and ic porter both took oath that I 1111 Iti t I they wore the only persons who secured I I liquor over the bar on that day Fhey > said If 1II11 t P they had Just come In from a fishing trip f fl I and were given the liquor to wtlmulato I 4 1 t their Imn Imagination HO they could success 111 II 1 fully describe the dbienslonn of the fish it f which got away III J Judge Diehl oplnrd that ho believed tho l I defendant guilty but would not render i t J I 1 hie decision until iho examined the prem jll I 1 H 11 1 I ises His Judgment will be given this af ternoon b II i ui I j i hr J |