Show CLARK LOSES HIS CASE Must Serve a Term of Four Years for Grand Larceny Tjic Supreme court yesterday handed down an opinion in the case > of The State vs J II Clark appellant in which the decision of the lower court Is illinned The defendant together with 7 Graham was convicted of grand Jar I cony for the theft of 570 from C F Johnson in a Commercial I street saloon on the night of April 17 IllO Both men wiro J sentenced to four years in the State prion and Albert Clark who was Implicated fn the robbery was convicted con-victed of receiving stolen property J and sen tentoil to a term In the county Jail J 11 Clark appealed to the Supreme court on Die I ground hat l lhlt lower court erred in not striking1 out a portion of the testimony thai the court erred in giving certain instructions to the jury and that the evidence wis Insufficient to Justify the verdict The Supreme court holds that the lower court did not err and that the suJlciency of the evidence evi-dence 1 Is a mutter wholly within the province of the jury and finds no ICS ic-S verslbk error in the record The opinion is vriticii by i Justice Hartch and concurred con-curred In by Justice McCarty and Chief Justice JJaskln |