Show r Ms client the Boston and Montana i company I NOT THROWN OVER TRANSOM Was any parlOr that sum thrown I over Senator Gelsors transom was uskiKl by Senator Turloy It was not WQ the reply asked Wellcome why he Campbell uked clcome had not testified In his own defense in testfed the before tho caso for his disbarment I Montana Supreme court Mv reason wns he sid that i considered It absolutely useless to ffo nbsolutel3 1 nn tho stand because I believed the Supremo court had made UD > Its mind Suprmo as to to decide the case and that I no lestlmany would have made any difference dif-ference LEFT WITH PEOPLE You were willing then to rest under the Imputation cast upon you without savinsanything In your own behalf mlfgon thlnS It to I was I was willing to leave the people of Montana How could you expect a favorable I verdict from the people when you made no statement The people knew that the court was Joplo not unbiased In tho matter I was a topic of common conversation BELIEVED COURT WAS IASED He Rave as JiJs J reason for believing l I that the ga court was biased agaifl8t hIm tho courts decision upbn the preliminary demurrer which mary question of tliodenlUrrer was filed in that case As n lawyer he fed I folt lUter that that there I must be some reason why the court wanted to take cofimlzuncc of the mat I tor and was convinced that the court was prejudiced against me FEARED DALY WOULD BUT Mr Wellcome Raid he had feared during dur-ing tho campaign that there would ben be-n effort on the part ot Dnjy people to buy Clarks votes away from him when It became evident that ho had enough votes to elecL Ho had not otherwise talked of bribery and If there was any bribery direct or indirect on the part of the Clan people he had known Jlothln of It He had talked moro or lefcs with Charley Clark about the expenditure 1C penditure of tho money In their control but nothing more than to discuss whether money should bo spent hero and there or to refer to the fact that their fund was disappearing rather rapidly IEAD BIG EXPENSE ACCOUNT In referring to his testimony before the hand Jury of Lewis and Clark county Mr Wellcome said his statement state-ment made then that he was n disbursing disburs-ing agent for Senator Clark was not meant In tho scn se of having been employed em-ployed or authorised by Clark to dIsburse 4 dis-burse money for him Wcllcomo said that for a time In Helena his expenses amounted to about 1000 a day lie had at least n hundred men there WHAT HE REMEMBERED Campbell tried to draw from Well come admissions concerning his Interviews Inter-views with Whiteslde and State Senator Sena-tor Clark of Madison but he would admit ad-mit nothing more than meeting them Ho could remember nothing that had been sid But he added I remem fcer some things that were not said The witness admitted that he had used his efforts to formulate Republican opinion In favor of Clarks candidacy and ho thought It probable that he had ostfad Republican members to vote for him to break the deadlock He had 3cen informed of the decision of the Republican Re-publican caucus as soon as It was announced an-nounced Recess was then taken BAXIC BOOK PRODUCED After the recess Mr Wellcome appeared ap-peared with his bank book and vouchers vouch-ers showing expenditures of money made by him during the Montana campaign cam-paign The defense did not offer these papers a evidence and the prosecution announced that It would not ask for the Introduction of them The commlt leo decided to examine the accounts through a subcommittee consisting of Senators Chandler and Caffery WHO FURNISHED MONET The witness In reply to questions said he had only seen the 30000 used by Whltcfilde in his exposure at his dlg barment trial and that ho had not furnished fur-nished the money Tour theory I understand Is that the money was furnished by some mem ber of the opposition suggested Sena tor Chandler That Is the theory replied the witness wit-ness nessNow give us tho names of the persons per-sons you suspect taking the widest latitude SUGGESTS DALY AS MAXI MAX-I would not go further than Mr Daly himself but I might suspect Mr Tuohy Mr PJHan Mr Harrlty Mr Whlteside himself or any member of the Silver Bow delegation as an intermediary inter-mediary Mr Wellcome said that after his elec tion Mr Clark had given him 5000 for his services and that he had also been paid 5000 by others for his work in the Interest of legislation His partner Mr Pott had received 52500 from Mr Clark r fpr legal services in the Wellcome dis barment case QUESTIONED BY TURLET In reply to Senator Turley the wit ness said that tho friends of Senator Clark had made an effort after the Whiteside exposure to trace the source whenco the 30000 had been received out had not succeeded satisfactorily You did not then get unauestion frblc proof of conspiracy I doubt It Did you get proof sufficient to con vince a fairminded man regardless of court rules 11 could not saj as to that Mr Wellcome was then excused Mr 9aulkner saying he would call C w Clark tomorrow and the committee ad ourned |