| Show I 4l GOULDS MILLIONS r Family Enjoined from Paying Anna Her Portion of Wealth I New York Nov 26 Samuel Uutcr I I meyer applied to nnd obtained today from Justice FlUsemld alttjng In the t I Supreme court nn Injunction order returnable 1 i re-turnable Monday net against the I I I Count and Countess Castcllanc Edwin II I and I and George Gould Howard Gould Helen M Gould ae trustees under the jl vlll of Jay Gould restraining them from paying to Anna Gould Countess de Castcllane any part ot the estate I In the hands of the trustees or from J applying uny part of the inuit fund to 1 the debts of Anna Gould or to her support I I sup-port 01 that of her children until the 1 further direction of the court The plaintiff In Lime suit Is Anthony J Dllt mar who sues as nsyi i nee of Ashor AYorlhcmcr a London brlcabruc dealer J I The complaint which Is a Ions print 1 ed document contains copies ot drafts drawn by Yertliumer and accepted In I writing by the Count and CounteSS de I Casicllanc amounting to upward of i W s COO of which 1IS50CO and upward I j are past due It is alleged that Anna j Gould has 1SOOO000 held In trust for i hut by her brothers and alsler and that her Income Is about 000000 It Is j I claimed that 250000 a year Is all that the Count and Countess require forth for-th < lr sunn01tnnd Lhe I i luinllfT asks that remainder of the Income should be applied to the payment of the eon pies debts It I Is said that ovjjr 2oOrOOO of surplus Income has already accumulated accumu-lated which ought Io4 be used for this purpose The present suit Is said to be a test case and It Is reported Is backed by other creditors than YVcrUi emcr emeA few weeks ago George J Gould was appointed guardian for the Countess Coun-tess de Castellane In a proceeding In a French court The creditors claim that the purpose of this proceeding was to get the ProPertY of the Countcsn de Caatellane away from attack by her creditors seas to enable the Goulds to force the settlement of the debts at their own time and on their own terms Judge Dillon counsel for the Gould I family made the following statement concerning the suite The Countess de Castellane Is nol entitled to any part of the capital principal sum of the estate es-tate of her father as the statement of the plaintiff seems to Imply The will of Air Gould provides In substance i Hint the Income Is to be a trust fund in the hands of the trustees to be appropriated appro-priated for the support And maintenance mainten-ance of his daughter and that she cannot can-not or dispose of any part of that Income until It Is actually received re-ceived by her and that until so received re-ceived It shall not be liable for her debts or those of her husband and undoubtedly un-doubtedly l the trustees will feel It to be their duty to have this provision In the vjll carried out In Its full extent or so far as possime She mitts no control I con-trol nor has the court any control over the principal sum which goes to her children after her death Jn tho foregoing statement It is said that creditors claimed at the proceedings proceed-ings in Parlsi whereby George Gould was appointed guardian for his sister that the Iden of the Gould family was to get possession of the Income of the Countess Castcllane and force her creditors to settle on their own terms This Is obviously a mistake as the only effect of that proceeding Is to prevent her from Incurring fresh obligations without the consent t of her brother |
