Show I TOM HIGH AI TftOn C JOM i FICH lUUtUE j 1 Dwells on the Peril Bryans j Election Would Bring I I j I MENACE TO ALL BUSINESS An AilAround Assault on Capitalists t Capital-Ists and Aggregations of Capital inS in-S Any F rmoA Cyclone of Ruin S Would Follow His Election Tho t tI I Republican Party the Party of Human Hu-man Rights Messrs Tanner and I Cottrcll at Kaysvlllo John Henry Smith at Ephraim HOI Thomas Fitch addressed a good audience of Republicans at Tooele City I last night speaking substantially as I follows No greater mlHfortimo could befall the i pcoplo of this counuy thnn tho election of UMIItnm J Bryan to the PruHldorcj Not alone boctiuHo of his unpatriotic alti utl unpatrloto tude on tho question of retaining tho Philippines nor yet because ho proposes 1 J rvptMl or tho JJlnglvy turlfT law and IL coiibcquint unsettling of the business of I man iactiirhig mid the production of wool sugar and lend lllii jioHltlon upon either of these Issues j ought to secure his defeat Ills position on both of thirl ought to make such de feat overwhelming But then Is oven < u graver reason for Mot Intiusilng tho Gov urnmont of this country to Mr J3ryan und I his associated and Jlattorcru I Is I a rca fon that IQ found Ja the character of the inn I II 11nI In I within ones memory how tho cloc tlon of Grover Cleveland with a Demo erotIc IfoiiBt and Senate brought about t D withdrawal of capital from monufnc turIng cmorpilHOs with lnerIhies wl a consequent fall In valued followed by failures by 11 ing of mills mines factories and furnaces II fur-naces and bv 1 depriving hundreds of thou relMo sands of workers of employment And yet except upon the tariff question Mr Cleveland was t consonatlvc man Jlo was opposed to experimental financial legislation iio was opposed to arraying labor against capital Ho would never have appointed Allgclil a Justice of tho I United States Supreme court and ho stood for order and law and election to both I personal and property rights Mr Brjan on tho contrary advocates an allaround assault on capltallstR and on aggregations of capital In any form Whether Mr Bryan If ho should ever reach tho White House would or would not seriously attempt a tltho of the mischief mis-chief he threatens I Jo not know Even with a Democratic Senate nnd House be hind him ho might reconsIder his plat mlsht reconller form declaration and bo ashamed to fnco the civilized world with an order recall lug our trocps and abandoning the Fill plnoH to loot and rapine from their own savages or to military rulo by Europe Ho might not attempt to forco through a tfirllt law that would Inflict It mortal blow upon our manufacturing Interests and cause bankruptcy to nerch like 1 bird of night upon halt the ledgers In tho land Power makes men conservative and Mr Bryan might not really attempt to carry out ns President nil tho follies ho favors as I candidate for president but I the more fear that ho mJght bo able to do some of tho thlnga ho promlwes to do would bilng our present prosperity to a sham and sudden ond old lieiwnon tiin I November which chronicled his election and tho llarch which witnessed his Inau S guratlon a cyclone of ruin would sweep oer tho land IIR CONVICTS HIMSELF Do I mlsstato his position or misjudge positon mlsjutgo the effect of his success Out of his own mouth comes the cldenco to convict him 11 has been tho practice of TJepubllcans to accord to Mr Bryan credit for sincerity and Integrity but In his speeches made during this campaign ho strips himself of all title to our friendly consideration or respect and with the record of juty years o Democratic misdoing behind him and before him and all around him he has the limitless assurance to say that Tho Republican party IH dominated bv those Influences which constantly lend to clo vale pecuniary conalderallons and Ignore human rights He further says that tho pending campaign is A contest of tho man against the dollar that It Is I u contest con-test between Inn the hnndhvork of God represented In his opinion by himself as tho Democratic lender ana money tho handiwork of man represented he nssuiiifs by President McKlnlcy as tho Republican leader 1 take these three sentences from Mr Bryans speeches as a text for my present discourse because although somewhat vnguo In rhetoric they are sufficiently explicit In spirit to exhibit his purposes and thQ direction of his thought IupO 5 Adopting a favorlto rhetorical formula I o Mr Bryan I might suggest that I do not say that ho Is Intellectually dishonest and a brawling demagogue but 1 do nay I I that when he stales that the Republican can parlv Is dominated bv those Inllu I onces which constantly tend to elevato humanity and Ignore human rights he I Is guIlty of H brazen slander lander which II endeavors to sustain by thread bare misrepresentations and weak sophIsms soph-Isms When Mr Bryan asserts that the Republican Re-publican party his anywhere 1 Htjuiy time legislated in tho Interest 01 tho rich against the poor or that It has anywhere fit any time favored or pi elected Improperly Improp-erly thoHo aggrcgatlono o capital which arc called trusts ho Is guilty not merely mere-ly I of a campaign roorback but of an old fiuhloned Mcndez Pinto Munclmusop Ananias and Sapphlra combination When and where has iho Republican pnrlj been dominated by pecuniary con slderallons When and whore luu It 1 norel human rlghlH I will not accept ac-cept tho looso cxpectoratlan of Mr Bry ans speech sis sufficient proof of tho chnr e 1 call for a bill of particulars THE PARTY OF HUMAN RIGHTS 1 Is not tho Republican party Unit Is I dominated by Influences which flcelc to Ignoie l human rights It Is tho Democratic part That party was dominated by In i lluenccs which tend to Ignore human lrnoN rights when at tho demand of the share holders It struck down the Missouri com I I promise and Insisted that oven from the I PlatEd lo tho Columbia slavery hould follovaijd bo protcclodbyIhc flag J I was dominated by those t Influences When f the Democratic Chief Justice of iho j United Slates Supremo court hissed In tho face of civilization the atrocious doc I trlno that a negro has no rights that 0 while mal Is I bound to respect It was dominated by those lntlticncc when It l struck a tho flag nnd for four woury bitter years maintained a contest tlut sent 0 million bravo bright youths to promnturo graves and desolated the iiuniifl of a continent and inortiragod time mOltlug1d labor of peiierutlons I wan dominated b > HHW t Influences when It I opposed atop by slop each of our great constitutional amendment and fought In turn every I wise moasiurc of llnanco of freedom and of protection I Is domlnntcd by those Inlluonccn today In proponing a tariff policy that would again close the hives of industry and send labor out upon tho highways hungry and hopeless It In dominated dom-inated hy those Influences In depriving tho black voters of the South of their right of suffrage because they vote Limo Republican ticket Tho Democrats are affluent Intlelr nlntlorm promises bum t they have often I illustrated tho hackneyed jest that Democratic Demo-cratic platforms aro like railroadcar plulforms they arc made not to stand upon but to g < H In upon and passciiucrn I uro cautioned not to land on tho platform plat-form Tho true spirit of IL political party IK Hot aluuys to bo found In Its platforms I These itte ottqn hint the dross uiilformu of I pirtfSty Thc3bVara oforiiotlnieA compounded compound-ed nccordhiK l Talleyrands ddccrlplldn of words which ho said wero miido to conceal Ideas AH for instance tho Democratic national I platform 1 of 1Sfl2 which pledged the purty to freo trade and free banking und fulfilled the uromlsu with tho currency sugar trust tariff and 3 restricted SPIRIT OF TIE PAUTVT I yon would know thc true spirIt oC 0 i political 1 party you muqt go to the aws I which It onficLs when In power and tIme laws It opposcH when out of power Ap i ply this lest to tho Republican pivrty Un I fold tho volumes of laws which during x forty earl It haw placed In iho Nations I Hblrnrlea und point mo It you can lo a simmgio atuiutu that Is In spirit orin detail false to freedom to Union or to I HIM I interests of labor 1 How Is It with Mr Bryans party I pplly i for time Nation It 111 ntlar but ace In fort yrs th o power lo cniiot or roneal n law of Consre 31ell its his i tory is I nocoflHarlly a history of ncpiUlons hut tho spirit of caatc the aiilrlt of Jjt norlnc humui rights > Iho Spirit ol opnoyl lon to tho Interests of tho to ling jnnsscs Is manlfeaL In all that It I lan l pro poscxLand In nil that It has oppoycd for ollPOlct fcr forty years Its record is I i repeat a rec I J i j ord of opoosltlon Opposition to tho homestead lawS opposition to Government aid to tho building of tho first Pacific rallrcadt opposition to tho oxcluulon ofj Hivory In the District of Columbia opposition op-position to the war for tho Union opposition oppo-sition to tho emancipation proclamation opposition 10 each constitutional nmend mont opposition lo protection of homo Industry opposition to all wise measure of foreign or domestic policy Against thU history of ncgatlonw T place that of tho party which Mr Bryan alleges al-leges IH attempting to Ignore human rights and by l the comparison Republicans Republi-cans are content to stand or fall I |