| Show UTAH LAKE LANDS Titlo Quieted to Land on Shore of Utah Lake Another opinion written by Justice Miner and concurred In by Chief Justice Jus-tice Bartch Judge Baskln dissenting was handed down affirming the judgment judg-ment of the trial court In the case of JjUclcn N Hinckley and Edwin S Hlnckley vs George T Peay and Annie M Peay appellants The action was lo quiet tlllo to a portion of a tract of fiftyseven acres of land on the shores of Utah lake The point at Issue is-sue was whether the owner of land on the shores of the lake w as entitled to the possession of an area of land len dry by the receding of the lake and which directly joined his other piop criy L The court held that the owner of such land had a right to f llow the water wa-ter as It recedes and Is entitled to all I the land which might be added thereto there-to by recession or accretion the tiainc as he would have to stand time loss if I time water rose and encroached on his land I Attachment Suit Settled The attachment suit recently filed by W A Sherman against Frederick II 1 Mills ct al to recover 5000 alleged to be due on balance of the purchase price of a block of Overland mining company stock was yesterday dismissed dis-missed by stipulation the Parties having hav-ing arrived at a settlement Water Case Still on Trial The water case of time llerrlman Irrigation Ir-rigation company vs J W Keel time Bullerlleld Mining company ut al was on again yesterday before Judge Ko lapp The day was occupied In taking testimony for time defendant The trial will probably be concluded today Action on a Note Suit was yesterday filed in the Third District ncourt by E C Stratford against Daniel G McGlnley et al lo recover 400 on a promissory nole secured se-cured by a mortgage |
