OCR Text |
Show JENKINS ON TEIAL. Grave Charges Laid at His Door by a Young Girl. EMILY C. JORGENSEN, PLAINTIFF. A Crae Which lias Stirred the Little Bus of Handy and Furnished Food for ssips to Feed On for Weeks Trial Prozressins Slowly-CiTil Settings-Law and Motion Calendar. Calen-dar. The case of the people against Ralph Jenkins, Jen-kins, charged with committing rape upon Emily a Jorgensen at Sandy on the 29th of August last, was begun in the Third district dis-trict court this morning with Fred Steiner on the stand for the defense. The prosecution prosecu-tion in this case claimed that Jenkins outraged out-raged Misi Jorgensen on the morning of August 27 a few blocks from the home of her parents. The defense urged an alibi, with incidental evidence proving the immaculate immac-ulate character of the defendant. The witnesses for the defense proved in the main "iiat the reputation of young Jen- kin for morality, chastity and decency was good. The plaintiff in the meantime had established es-tablished the fact that Miss Jorgensen had been assaulted, and the evidence went to show that Jenkins was the culprit who com-niiftyu com-niiftyu the act. Jenkins is a young "man of about 19, with sandy features, thick lips, dull eyes. Miss Jorgensen is a petite girl of 14 or 15 years. The great bulk of test'inony introduced at the morning session was to establish the reputation of young Jenkins. It was largely legal' verbiage and a piling' . up of evidence. The case was still running as The Times went Ao pree. SETTINGS OF CASES. The following settings of cases was made by Judge Zanc immediately upon the opening open-ing of Court: jfondav. Otober 17 John F. Marks vs W. H. f 1 TT f t v. r.i a n aany; w . ti. t asaciv vs Joan tr. juarts; a. t. Lawsan et at. vs J. E." Tavlor. Tuetday, October ih M. 3. ATChhim vs David Smith; John Williams vs Peter Welte; Alary Lalite v V. S. M.trtin. Weditfidny, October 10 Sarah J. Le7 vs E. H. Parson; John C. II eessh et al. vs S. R. Marks: John W. White vs Orepon tJUort Line and L'tah Ncr'.hern Railway companies. Thanlay, October to 11. E. Wheeler vs. John W. Campbell; E. A. Jlaryon vs. John V. Campbell Camp-bell Adam Duncan vs. W. H. II. Spaffcrd et aL Monday, October U Walter A. Atwood vs. T. J. E.liiet al. ; James H. Smith vs. F. K. Morris: Frank H. Dyer vs. Kio Grande Western Railroad Company. Tut&iay, October 1 5 S. R. Marks & Co. vs. Marsit Tnckett et al. ; Frank T. Cochrane ve. Ouna A. Bussche; W. H., Cromer vs. Arthur Me.ids. Weiinitday, 9ctober 26 Mary Ana Hadley vs. Union Pacific Bailway Company; Ann Faneter-raaker Faneter-raaker Tnueue PutUsliiig Company. Thvmdc.Otiobtr t7 -Win. Ssndford vs. X. H. Hallstrara; Lars Jenson vs. Charles Gilmore; 31. A. Stringer ve. Gilbert L. Chamberlain. Friiay October ts John Chappet vs. John L. Webber! -Martha Preefer vs. Klla Hennesey; American Publishing Co. vs. A. Fisher et al. Moniiay, OcUber .VI J. 8. Johnson vs. K. T. Pnrton, jf. ; Aaron Keyser vs. Thomas Matthews et el. ; K S. Berntee!e va. C. M.- Brown et aL Tnfxi" SitaeiMbtr i John A. Larson vs. "WJo FBffelc&Co; Joeph 1'hbmaon vs. iapid Transit street railroad; Lillian Trimmer ve. liyman Harris. Yr ffln'sduy, Xovember J Leu R. Hare vs.. Job O. Williams, et al. ; A.J. Dnnford vs. John W. Young; Thomas Homer vs. InterMountain Abstract Ab-stract Co. Thursday, November 3 PoUifcone, Mil iken Co. vs. U'ah Central Ka:lway Co.; Frank Knnkel et al. vs. Lewis Y, KeUey et al. ; Frederick Collins Col-lins vs. 8ait Laks Dramatic association. Friday, Xorzmber i- John Robinson vs. Oregon Ore-gon Short Li!!e & Vtah Norihern Ksilwav Co.; William Eckoritly et al. vs. Eric T. Kjellstrom; A. Schas vs. E. W. McDaniels et al. BEFORE JVIJGK ANDERSON. Orders Made In Civil Cases The Law and Motion Docket. The following orders were made before Judge Anderson this morning: The case of Mary S. McLaren vs. Alonzo G. Bast et al. was stricken from the docket. E. R. Blasdell vs. Ernie O. Olsen et al.; default; de-fault; decree of foreclosure and $200 attorney's attor-ney's fee. Patrick Ryan vs. First South Extension Horn Silver Mining Co.; default and judgment; judg-ment; said judgment tnay be set aside without with-out showing on motion of Zane, attorney for defendant, within ten days, providing de-t de-t fendant files answer herein within said time. LAW AND -MOTIOX DOCKET. J. W. Sullivan et al. vs. Louis F. Kullah; motion to strike out araendmut ove-ruled. Mason Jc Co. vs. Salt Lake Board of Trade; demurrer to complaint withdrawn; ten days to answer. . Louis Brown et al, vs. C. M. Brown et al.; passed. v S. Roqueta vs.E. H. Parsons; demurrer to complaint argued and twenty days given to answer. Bauedict Silgfus vs. B. A. M. Froiseth et al. ; demurrer to complaint argued and submitted. sub-mitted. II. Pembroke vs. Alfred Reese et ah; passed. John Seby et al., vs. George Martin; demurrer de-murrer to complaint sustained; twenty days to amend. ' Seymour B. Young vs. Amos Weff; settled. - Verina Schwin et al. vs. William P. Rowe et al. ; passed. Henry C. Haarstick vs. Moylan C. Fox, executor; motion for new trial referred to Zane. Perry Lumber company vs. August Trep-pemann Trep-pemann et aL ; demurrer to counter claim confessed: ten days to amend. York Mining company vs. Petro Mining company; passed. Robert T. Southworth vs. Wilter M. Steed; passed. Eaele Foundry & Machine Co. vs. James ; M. Kennelly; demurrer to complaint withdrawn; with-drawn; twenty days to answer, j E. P. Austin vs. Peter Anderson ; demurrer demur-rer to complaint overruled; ten days to answer. an-swer. W. E. Fatterson vs. F. Miller; demurrer to amended complaint overruled; ten days to answer. Leonard Hilpert vs. Sells' Lime, Cement & Rock Co.; demurrer confbssed. CASES 1H8M1S9ED. The following cases were dismissed on motion mo-tion of attorney for the prosecution: W. P. Read vs. John M. Young et al. O. P. Arnold vs. John M. Young et al. William Dunbar vs. John M. Young et al. J. W. Haddock vs. John M. Young et ah Edward Mantrel vs. John M. Young et aL V. 11. uaies vs. i. r. lung. Beckwitu London Consolidated Co.' vs. Peter M. Anderson et aL R. A. Kilpatriek vs. Martin Mahuken. Probate Court. The following orders were made in probate court today by Judge Bartch: Estate of B. F. Allen, deceased; hearing on petition for letters of administration; Joseph G Souther appointed administrator; bond, $6700. Estate of Sarah Hardy, deceased; hearing on final accounting and petition for distribution; distribu-tion; allowed except items of $10 for medical medi-cal expenses and $20 for clothing, which were dismissed without prejudice; distribution distribu-tion made as prayed and executor discharged. dis-charged. Estate of Fanny Foster, deceased; case continued to October 26. mm. |