OCR Text |
Show A peculiar ruling was made in one of our minor courts yesterday to the effect that an ordinary employe of an establishment has "no right to object to or approve" the acts of an intruder in that establishment. This was followed fol-lowed up by a witness testifying that he had not interfered with the perpetra-tioti perpetra-tioti of an alleged crime in the place where he was employed because he was not in charge and bad no authority to act. , It is fortunate that no such idea prevails generally. It is the duty of an employe to protect his employer's interests, and the rule of law is the exact reverie of that laid down. When it comes to the protection protec-tion of an establishmant from felonious intrusion, every employe is cluthed with authority to resist, and he may resort to force to thwart the purpose of tha iutruder. |