OCR Text |
Show A SUIT FOR DAMAGES. Superintendent licad aud O hers Demand Indemnity From tha Police tore. The railway war struck another tangent during the day, and going before be-fore Cierk McMillan of the district court, Messrs. llawlins it Critehlow commenced action in damages against C.ty Marshal John V. Young aud the squad of oliicers who made' tho arrests yeslurday morning. The following list ( complaints appears on the records. V. P. Head ts John M. Young, F. M. (;ienu and Hugh L. Glenn. Saul plain-tilV plain-tilV complains and alleges that on June '.'s, lttl, said defendants assaulted aud beat the plaiutiir and imprisoned him for two hours without causa or excuso to his damage iu the sum of 5,(;0O. Wherefore plaintiff prays judgment against said dcteudant iu the said sum of (5,000 and for costs of suit. (). P. Arnold vs J diu M. Young anil Thomas Mathews. The eomplaiut cites the same cause of action asiutue above and asks damages in the sum of $5,000 and costs. These are followed op by the case of J. W. Haddock vs. John M. Young, Carl lliikoer, Abraham Randolph aud Thomas Mathews. Same cause of action ac-tion are cited and damages iu the sum of .'iOH) an asked. William Hdmmer vs. John M. Young, Carl ISirkue and Thomas Mathews. Same cause as in the foregoing cited and damages in the sum of 3 rtlUO asked. Fdwnid Mangl vs. John M. Young, Abraham Randolph and Klnier Yocum. same cause cited and 'damages in tho sum of $5000 asked. The starting of the suit has caused quite a sensation in police circles, and was tho absorbing topic of conversation on the streets throughout the afternoon. |