OCR Text |
Show THE DM OF A DAY. The Criminal Calendar Reopened and Set-. Set-. tings Made for the Next Eventful Event-ful Ban. BOTH OOUBTS NOW IN SESSION. Tho Pickard Eoare-Crow Moisted Once More Fl j nn's Motion for a New Trial. The criminal calendar was opened again this morning and sittings made to and including March 25, after which it will lapse until April lit. The seusatiouat features consist of a braco of murder trials, that of Frank Raymond to begin March 21, to bo followed by the Diamond Dia-mond tragedy the following day. Thero is but one United Stains case in which Situ Duggias charged with adul-try adul-try is defendant. Following is the calendar: MONDAT, MARCH 10. Feoplo vs. James Howard and ffra. Kennedy; grand larceny. People vs. John Cannons; robbery, ' People vs. George Haight. Tl'KSDAV, MAHC11 17. Poople vs. Stevens Daniols et al; grand larceny. People vs. D. C. Johnson; assisting prisoners to escape. Peoplo vs. D. H. Morton; house breaking. WKDNKSDAY, MARCH 18. People vs. Abraham Hunter; assault etc. People vs. Abraham Hunter: grand larceny. People vs. Dette Schroodur, assault etc. Tril HSPAY, MARCH 10. Peoplo vs. Stafford and Archer; robbery. rob-bery. People vs. Wm. N. Bevins; forgery. People vs. James Young (three cases) robbery. FRIDAY, MAI.CH 2.0. People vs. David Gossford; assault. People vs. Sam Reggell; gaming. People vs. Schell & Uarr; embezzlement. embezzle-ment. MONPAT, MARCH 23. People vs Walter Walker; attempt to rape. United States vs. Sim Duggins; adultery. adul-tery. TI F.SPAY, MARCH 24. People vs. Frank Raymond; murder. WEPNF.SPAT, MARCH 25. Peoplo vs. William Diamond; murdor. MONDAY. APRIL 1. United Slates vs. Lee Owsley; perjury United States vs. John F, Free; per- J1" 3 United States vs. Alex. Toponco; perjury. per-jury. The crusade against the porjurers is fierce warning to the man who has underrated un-derrated the necessity for veracity in the grand jury room and upon the witness wit-ness stand. Heretofore many offenses under this head have been overlooked, not that they have eluded the speaker's wary eye, but that in a charitable impulse im-pulse bold and flagrant discrepancien have been attributed to bsd memory or a "typographical error." The limit has been reached, however, and there is now a determination to correct the most, pernicious evil that haunts the temple of justice. Before Judge Anderson the motion for new trial and arrest of judgment, in the case of tho J'eople vs. John Duo Flynu for grand larceny was overruled and Wednesday set for sentence. Flynn, who languished in tho ribbed waiting room during tho morning, was accordingly token back to his lodgiugs in the penitentiary. The Ivll Iiorket. Judge Zane transacted the following business: In the case of the Societe de Mines, etc., vs. The Old Jordan Mining Min-ing company, a continuance was ord-for ord-for the term. The case of Jones vs. Galligber was submitted without argument. George ('aim 4 vs. Henry Wagner, called and passed. Trial was then proceeded with in the caso of J. F. ('onnor vs. John Chappell, an action brought on appeal from tho justice of the peace at l'ark City to recover $100. K. B. Critchlow anil J. M. Thomas, counsel for the respective sides. Mefore Atitlergon. Councilman l'ickard's application for an injunction restraining the transfer of the old Fort block on the order of tho city council was again brought tip and allowed to remain open. It will probably be brought up again tomorrow tomor-row morning and a time set for argument. argu-ment. A. G. Adamsou vs. Frank Rudy. Demurrer De-murrer to amendments sustained. The Live i'ine Con. Mining Co. ts. Henry Denlmlter; notice of motion to increase the bond on injunction tiled. The Same vs. the South Galena Mining Min-ing company; same order hs iu the foregoing. Iu the case of Cummings vs. Cum-miugs, Cum-miugs, application for divorce, a decree was granted the wife on the ground of non support. Judge Anderson was a little inquisitive, however, and led the applicant through quite a row of stumps i in which it was ascertained that, the malcontents, had been, to all intents and purposes, divorced for ten years last passed. During that period he had contributed $-'0 to her maintenance ' while prior to the estrangement Mrs. Cummings alleged that slio had been compelled to support him. "life was indolent, shiftless," remarked re-marked the little lady going buck be-! be-! hind the scenes, "anil I was compelled j to mike my own living ten years before be-fore I left him." " Then you left him?'' "I did, your honor: I was tired of supporting him." The court believed with the lobby that a woman who had to take care of herself was entitled to her independence and the sepauation was allowed. |