Show it 1 I 1 y DEBT LIMIT al I 1 cores opinion for the j 1 ares CA S 4 iti PLENTY PLENTY OF LEEWAY i 1 board my A tow how the th rg l t ihen art last ills tb county cun equal tt alb A the denue Ben ll fr for tile t cur VA lid the tax levies for V rt al year r A blowing for of last C te rips irei the be C commission in mission more aa d spend 41 41 X has attorney an to he isoard of county Z ing opinion as al rk indebtedness that can at of a 1 I creal red by the th counties count lM 4 ni 1 response rt xe to your arr ru I 1 4 as 08 to t ac it mount winlon ka 4 am that can ile he legally in this state I 1 beg under section I 1 ou that ih lee you it of the siege con ution it of chapter I 1 1 of the las a ie it II is 1 provided ties that no 1 the llie taxes for the cur 11 ait of t ill ha be created by any con coun it avow won ther thereof cof unless the I 1 such debt shall create I 1 go 1 submitted to A i VO vole te of 0 the 1 1 wiktora of tins tile county seea acea ill lit w one a article of 0 the con bilu is the entire indebtedness rl created under al all I 1 4 of the assessed a per NT cell infer property ot of the county it my to t jilt determine the in an indebtedness Is in kd ad against a county I 1 it of ct the late alte territory of ilar BUT in t to ou 1 the n e ill a the ahr state slate coneal it lo 10 re boa quoted received a ludl judi by the SuP supreme relue coul cobit t tilory in I 1 the case or F craton 1 tt at and in that case the lie brat no indebtedness Indebted nen nebs w as ln in I 1 bin ills meaning of 0 the law 1 W expenditures in any year it revenue for such year r a of the court in that cl ase clestion la Is as aa follows tol lows we anve couble el tor for the plaintiff that I 1 ltd see ot of claims age against anat the ml to the revenue for or the 11 tall 10 not it a creation or incur I 1 y indebtedness or liability i ur mis for or the current year I 1 until the end of 0 the m re tin atter after they B a ej as aa a legal leeal ceru ore am to be treated as aj if t al I 1 feted and allom ances may be hit t such treace to the extent I 1 this th construction to the li it would appear that I 1 ir be allowed against the g be present ear 1891 1996 teat it equal to the re revenues ver eares of 0 for the current year arid and thereto reto claims may be ELI al lount equal to the taxes athe at year OF CLAIMS led ly by the he county auditor i have been allon alien ed cd and war bean dravin drahn on of the county from january to novem to la the amount of tit this amount was ria ress created prior to janu 1 arid that warrants to the issued during the m have bleve lorn been canceled and acting these two amounts 01 ol I 1 anio unta of 0 warrants warrant Is 18 rent nit year leaves a bal jr rl u r advised by the county bounly tt it ire re rd denues of 0 the county t ear ar will amount to in the total amount of abid d during the year 1896 mm d be deducted the amount ta aich ach represents the in in currad prior to january M to lor r which warrants var rants have a during the present year 11 leave a balance of 0 lauas n ring the garrit warrants tit issued ed incurred during the mr air which Is about less leg q tAtI revenue for for th the e E A BIG LIMIT YET iltha the provisions of 0 tile the cony the laws lw of 0 this state up P act in the light of the preller court in the cae A of 0 calr f st al 11 quoted caboge above s bt limit 1 alt would no not t he be aunill 11 have been al eduin aun to thone already al W to this itil balance of 0 tle ill 1 to the amount of 0 taxes 1 I 1 ia berit year thlu are elli IZ or in other words it 11 amount tot of at least 1 I 1 billowed fill yd owed during I 1 the he 1 about the conati 1 liblit Inal siou c it as tho the 11 I 1 to be allowed owed du during ring the tha n f 10 ill POE exceed or e tan be lefly ih 0 absolutely lu fly no ww clues lern alit 0 alt Bari anta rat ya outlier thi this mettr mr |