Show SUPREME OPINIONS Three W Were re Dow Down Yesterday In Tat That TribunaL J T Monroe nod arid O 0 J Salis Salisbury i bur bury mUst pay interest and tot costs to ate Guth l administratrix of the estate of Moroni WIlliams deceased according to one or of the three opinions hade handed down yesterday in the state supreme court court The opinion in ques Hon tion wat was written by A Associate Justice McCarty concurred In by Chief Jue tice Daskin Baskin and dissented from by As Associate Justice Bartch Baitch The acton action was begun in the Third Judicial district court on Oct 13 1890 b by Kate Guthel to collect 50 from fromI I Gimer Climer Salisbury Co I It was wag al aI alleged I that on Nov Noy 20 O ISS Williams sold a mine to the company for 16 0 receiving cash I It vas agreed that he was to receive the tho bal balance balance ance as rn on as the purchasers sold the mine A mining com company pan was form formal the majority of the stock being held by O 0 J Salsbury Salisbury and the mine WI lams hams sold the Salisbury com company pan wa was j transferred to the new company for a aI aI I sum 1 To other paries parties the I Williams mine which afterwards proved to be quie quite valuable together with some additional mining calms claims I was sold for The sued ue the Salle bur bury company compan for the due on the Williams minE mine The company resisted d don on the ground that the fale sale Of the mine only onh nete netted 1 hence under th the agreement t there wis was no valid aUd for the The lower court found for the woman and the supreme curt court sustained the tri l judge This Is the second time the cae case has hasben ben been before the supreme court The I first time i it wa was tried tried th the Salisbury company was victorious in the distrct district and supreme courts courts In the cae case of M 1 L Garit Garrity against I the Champion MinIng company the decision of the low lower r court wa was affirmed The jur jury which tried the acton action found for the the miner in inthe inthe the sum of 1015 1695 costs and interest I The n accident h happened on June Z 24 I 1902 I It was an acton action to recover for personal injuries alleged t have ben been sustained b by Garri Garrity because or of the failure to furnish a reason reasonably reasonably I ably sate safe course of Ingress and egress to and from hIS place of work In the defendants mine The opinion was written by Associate Justice McCarty McCart Chief Chlof Justice Baskin wrote the opinion opinion ion In the case of r f Wp w Hicks app ppl l llant lant vs the Southern Pacific company compan respondent I It reversed th the lower court which granted the company a nonsuit after the plaintiff had intro luceti his evidence The supreme court holds the judge an error In granting the defendants moton motion and orders the ca caSe to be tred tried lick flicks was wasa I a a hand working for the cOrn COm COmI pan pany at Ogden and was inure injured while I a assisting In the removal of some ris rails from a hand car which was wag on the track in front of a rapidly ap approaching approaching traIn The case was an ac acton aci I i ton lion to recover for an Injury alleged I to have hare been inflicted upon Hicks b bi by bythe i the negligence ot of the company compan in whose service h he was employed at the time the Injury was ed |